will nick mangold be there in the 2nd when we pick? If we could get him in the second and a good tackle in the 1st our oline would be a lot better.
Skeet84 said:There is a chance he could slip alittle bit. How does everyone feel about Greg Eslinger tho? He would be there in the Second and might be in the third. Mangold could be there in the second , But thats a big maybe!
jtsacksyou said:will nick mangold be there in the 2nd when we pick? If we could get him in the second and a good tackle in the 1st our oline would be a lot better.
Alex22 said:You wanna go O-line rounds one and two :eek:
what about all the other holes we need to fill
Anyway, I dont think he will be there but never count it out, this draft has a lot of depth and guys that could go ahead of him
Danny said:First I'm hoping for Bentley but if we don't get him I'd love to get Mangold but he'll be gone late 1st or early 2nd....I don't like Eslinger for us and I can't see us going o-line with our top 2 picks either but I can see us going defence with our top 2 picks....Lawson at 16 and maybe DB in the 2nd....Watson is also posible as is Carpenter if Lawson's gone.
Ozzy rules!!
Skeet84 said:Yeah I would draft Justice and Mangold with our first two picks cause Oline is our biggest problem at the moment. You get that line going and thats gunna help Ronnie and the passing game. No need to have a QB if you gunna get him hurt.
SpeedRush99 said:Eslinger is to small IMO.
Skeet84 said:Yeah, But so is Mike degory and you like picking him.
what is IMO?
SpeedRush99 said:Hmmmm.... I agree its a need but biggest problem? I'd definitely put it behind QB and secondary, especially if we lose Madison.
SpeedRush99 said:I think he's a good center, but probably wouldn't fit our system either.
In My Opinion