no sexy picks this year

[ROADRUNNER]

i think we will have to wait till next year for our sexy pic,
for eg; nt, lb, o/l, lb, s, cb, o/l, wr, lb.
thats our draft for 2009,
nothing sexy there but a need.

now 2010 thats when sex is on the menu? :d-day:

 

[JT-forpresident]

i dont agree ... at least a corner or a safety will be selected on day one... i dont know if its a sexy pick lol but it's a skill position

edit; i just noticed you put the safety and corner in your list... how can you not think of a ballhawk being "not sexy " ?

 

[phinfan33]

i think we will have to wait till next year for our sexy pic,
for eg; nt, lb, o/l, lb, s, cb, o/l, wr, lb.
thats our draft for 2009,
nothing sexy there but a need.

now 2010 thats when sex is on the menu? :d-day:

i agree on no "sexy" picks in this draft..i feel our LBing corp and the trenches on both sides will be addressed in this draft..i also feel our Secondary will be addressed some in this draft...WR might get looked at somewhere between the 5th to 7th rds...

 

[I am Bane]

yeah we probably will get a second day WR at least, if not late third.... but i dont see a CB coming our way really, but maybe a Safety if a Delmas or Chung is available into the third-fourth themselves.

tell Mel Kiper we arent going for big playmakers, and fancy stuff for "quick easy points"

 

[ROADRUNNER]

i dont agree ... at least a corner or a safety will be selected on day one... i dont know if its a sexy pick lol but it's a skill position

edit; i just noticed you put the safety and corner in your list... how can you not think of a ballhawk being "not sexy " ?

because i have them at pick 5/6, now if they were 1/2 , thats sex on a stick:d-day:2010

 

[ROADRUNNER]

2010 draft picks, going by the rounds 1/7
#1 cb
#2 s
#3 wr
#4 cb
#5 o/l
#6 lb
#7 wr