Now lets get this kid some Weapons to play with. what wr's are still avaiable later? | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Now lets get this kid some Weapons to play with. what wr's are still avaiable later?

There is a kid out of Appalachian State (Div 1A) named Brian Quick. And he is. Been watching him the past 4 years. Can also return kicks/punts. He's the real deal and is expected to go round 4 or possibly 3. Admittedly, I am bias being an ASU alumni.
 
People keep asking for a WR, while getting rid of a star like Marshall does leave a void, idk if it needs to be filled in this offense. The WC offense is designed to spread the ball all over the field. Obviously it wouldnt hurt to have a very skilled WR, but I think the biggest boost to our offense would be a new OT or TE. Otherwise we should go pass rusher in 2nd round. Hit WR/TE back to back in the 3rd, and load up at OL,DB,OLB, and maybe a RB in the last few rounds.
 
We have 4 main weaknesses. WR TE OL and Pass Rush. We have to trade down in the second for another pick.
 
We need to trade one of our thirds with St. Louis or we will not get Hill. Guranteed St.Louis will take him otherwise.
 
Specialk0832 said:
Stephen Hill is a must if he can miraculously fall for the next 9 picks.
With his size and speed, we can't pass that up, if he does get taken off the board, Alshon Jeffery is still there too.
Both guys are very good WR's and I'd be happy with either one.
No matter who we take, offense/defense, the player must make an impact.

WE'VE MISSED ON TOO MANY 2ND ROUNDERS!!!!!
Click to expand...

No kidding on the missing on 2nd rounders... It'd be a miracle if Stephen Hill or Randle would fall to us. It'd be awesome to trade back up into the 2nd also and try to grab a pass rusher. Use late round ammo (not the 3rds) or picks next year
 
BoulderFinFan said:
People keep asking for a WR, while getting rid of a star like Marshall does leave a void, idk if it needs to be filled in this offense. The WC offense is designed to spread the ball all over the field. Obviously it wouldnt hurt to have a very skilled WR, but I think the biggest boost to our offense would be a new OT or TE. Otherwise we should go pass rusher in 2nd round. Hit WR/TE back to back in the 3rd, and load up at OL,DB,OLB, and maybe a RB in the last few rounds.
Click to expand...

Your theory is fine about not needing a #1, but having a lot of solid guys. Well pretty much everyone on the Packers roster is better than Hartline and Bess, and everyone else on our roster isn't even worth mentioning.

Btw- Jennings is a legit #1 and while Driver was getting up there in age, when they had the two of them, that was a great combo. Nelson, Finley, Cobb: all better wr's than what we have.

We still need to massively upgrade. Hill or Randle would be grand
 
mrbunglez said:
Tannehill to Hill has a nice ring to it.....
Click to expand...

I agree. I also like Tannehill to Fleener.

How many years have we been torched by big athletic TE's? It SURE would be nice to have some turnabout. Les Brown might pan out, but having Fleener would give us a punch like NE has had over the past few years. I seem to recall them ripping apart the league with TE heavy sets.

TE or WR... we need matchup winners.
 
Fleener will be gone with Indys pick. They want the Luck/Fleener connection and a safety outlet for Luck.
 
seriously **** THE COLTS

They get Luck AND Fleener

im just pissed man. i hate that franchise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Martin but man I can't believe we passed on Stephen Hill....and he went to the Jets of all teams! Ughhh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom