Of course we know what some fools would be spouting here if RT had those same numbers | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Of course we know what some fools would be spouting here if RT had those same numbers

Daytona Fin said:
Still missing it.
Click to expand...
Entirely possible.

I'll tell you what I believe the point to be, and you can tell me if I'm correct in your opinion:

We shouldn't evaluate a quarterback on the basis of just one game.
 
LoneStarPhin said:
You know, if RT went 9 for 18 for 103 yards and a QBR of 25, even WITH a great rushing attack. He'd be called a bust, and a bus driver, and of course they would be dragging out their ypa charts showing how 5+ yards per attempt means he's finished. DONE! And no deep ball.

Then don't get me started with 4 interceptons, and 7 over the last two games. Sure there were flashes of brilliance and a great comeback win, but he obviously choked when it really counted and just couldn't get it done.
Click to expand...
Yep.
 
Definitely need to implement Vaark's suggestion of making thread creation a privilege limited only to some posters.

Ryan Tannehill, love him or hate him, is gonna be your 2014 starting QB. If you can't shut the **** up about him for five goddamn seconds, it's going to be a long year. You know there are 52 other players on the team, right? How about some threads on Reshad "Heist" Jones?
 
J. David Wannyheimer said:
Definitely need to implement Vaark's suggestion of making thread creation a privilege limited only to some posters.

Ryan Tannehill, love him or hate him, is gonna be your 2014 starting QB. If you can't shut the **** up about him for five goddamn seconds, it's going to be a long year. You know there are 52 other players on the team, right? How about some threads on Reshad "Heist" Jones?
Click to expand...

Don't give Vaark too much credit. People have been making that request for years. And besides, if he didn't share his wishes through picture, I cannot believe it to be authentic.
 
I think the name GRAVITY fits...

Nothing brings people down like gravity, lol. :brewskis:

I guess it takes all kinds to be Dolphans, lol.

LD
 
Funny, after reading the first paragraph I couldn't tell if you were referring to Luck, Wilson or Tannehill.


MadDog 88 said:
Lets not ignore that there are very legitimate concerns with the QB play. If you focus solely on the good or bad your objectivity is questionable. What most lose sight over is that he just finished his second year. He has flashed tremendous potential but had some bad moments and the last 2 games were pretty bad.

Unless he completely craps the bed next season he will be the starter in 2015 as well. Keep in mind that it wasn't until Brees' 4th season that he started playing at a consistently high level. With Tannehill showing the potential he has I won't be at all surprised to see him finish his rookie contract as the starter.
Click to expand...
 
LoneStarPhin said:
No, we're making light of fools who post here after one game, or every game, to claim how the QB numbers for that game mean the QB is a bust. If it's too hard for you to follow the conversation, maybe you should sit this one out.


By the way, we're well aware of your conclusions about RT. And also about how you try to CYA when he's playing great (yeah, you know....). You seem to waste a lot of your life finding and posting numbers, but in the end, you seem to have a difficult time finding the forest for the trees. Either that, or you have an agenda where you knowingly disregard what doesn't fit.
Click to expand...

he can't follow because there's no chart with ypa on it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom