Of The Following 3,Who Do You Think Should Get The Boot?

[DOL-FAN92]

Marty Booker,#86-My personal favorite.....Man this guy got thrown too like everytime since Chambers was traded,and he did a good job DROPING them...not to mention he would be banking $6M next year(which he is DEFINATELY not worth),he is slower than he used too be,OKAY running routes...overall,we wont take a slary cap hit if we cut him because we traded for him from Chicago(man i miss Adwale Ogunleye....that had too be one of the,if not,the stupidiest trade we ever made).Marty I believe would be gone anyway,he isnt Pacells type of player...6'0",206 and runs a 4.EVER:sidelol:

Travis Daniels,#29-Hard too not want to boot him,but I would keep him if we had the consideration between him and Marty....Daniels was a 4th round pick for us,was given a shot,and still played like a 4th round pick.He isnt fast enough to keep up with receivers(for example Randy Moss,in both games.....then again,who wasnt burnt by Moss????

Matt Roth,#98-Where do I begin....Wel...was the 13th overall selection in the 2nd round in 2005.Man what an upgrade.Can you imagine if we had not taded Surtain to draft this guy????Man we would have been fools...Although,I do question just a few things about Roth,like his durablity,awareness,tackling,the money he is raking in for his marvelous play,and too top it off his starting role....but thats just me.....:foundout:

 

[FINishedPerfect]

M. Booker definitely but C. Worrell can go right with him the guy is straight garbage.

 

[finsfan14]

travis daniels is number 29 and matt roth is number 98

 

[FINSFAN2781]

Without a doubt Booker is gone.

 

[finsfan14]

what are you talking about cameron worrell didnt do that bad for the time he played...he needs improvement on coverage but he is a very good tackler

 

[DOL-FAN92]

travis daniels is number 29 and matt roth is number 98

my fault...your right...

 

[ticophin]

I hope Booker doesn`t drop his check on his way out...

 

[dolpns13]

Marty Booker,#86-My personal favorite.....Man this guy got thrown too like everytime since Chambers was traded,and he did a good job DROPING them...not to mention he would be banking $6M next year(which he is DEFINATELY not worth),he is slower than he used too be,OKAY running routes...overall,we wont take a slary cap hit if we cut him because we traded for him from Chicago(man i miss Adwale Ogunleye....that had too be one of the,if not,the stupidiest trade we ever made).Marty I believe would be gone anyway,he isnt Pacells type of player...6'0",206 and runs a 4.EVER:sidelol:

Travis Daniels,#29-Hard too not want to boot him,but I would keep him if we had the consideration between him and Marty....Daniels was a 4th round pick for us,was given a shot,and still played like a 4th round pick.He isnt fast enough to keep up with receivers(for example Randy Moss,in both games.....then again,who wasnt burnt by Moss????

Matt Roth,#98-Where do I begin....Wel...was the 13th overall selection in the 2nd round in 2005.Man what an upgrade.Can you imagine if we had not taded Surtain to draft this guy????Man we would have been fools...Although,I do question just a few things about Roth,like his durablity,awareness,tackling,the money he is raking in for his marvelous play,and too top it off his starting role....but thats just me.....:foundout:

Definately Booker, and for good measure Daniels can go with him

 

[sleek]

C .Worrell is a good special teams player. He was in on alot of tackles and forced a fumble or two, he also gets downfield pretty fast.Parcells stresses good special teams.

 

[moe]

I think worrell did good........for being a thirteenth string or whatever.

 

[FINishedPerfect]

Wow you guys are crazy you must have forgot when he played safety all year the happiest moment was when he got hurt. The guy sucks special teams yes any other positon No

Here is a link for you:
http://www.talkingnfl.com/cameron-worrell-had-a-bad-day-at-the-office/

 

[Myles Fynch]

what are you talking about cameron worrell didnt do that bad for the time he played...he needs improvement on coverage but he is a very good tackler

I think he gets more than his fair share of criticism around here, too. In the Redskin game he came up from his safety position and really stuck some guys who had gotten through our line. In coverage he got beat, but Moss makes a lot of people look bad on endzone grabs. I never saw this guy not hustling, so I'd like to see what BP & Ireland think of him before we assume he has nothing to offer us.

 

[MarinoForPres]

what are you talking about cameron worrell didnt do that bad for the time he played...he needs improvement on coverage but he is a very good tackler

what happened in that pats game than?

 

[alen1]

what happened in that pats game than?

he got dominated .... by moss like everyone else in the REGULAR SEASON this year.

 

[I am Bane]

definitely booker.... Roth had a slump of a second year, but we need depth badly d-line, and maybe he can come back strong. Daniels, we need depth there too... keep him developing.