1. Romeo Cromell (or some DC with some sense of today's NFL game).
2. WR. I'd rather have a Marshall or Jackson than have to roll the dice a talented rookie, but either way, we need a #1.
3. ILB. The 3-4 should provide plenty of opportunity for ILB's to make big-time plays. Our ILB's never do. Spikes and McClain come to mind.
4. Safety. I'm a bit hesitant on this one, because I think our Safeties played well in the first half - when they were put in positions to do what they do well. But, they're still not versatile enough.
5. TE. Our offense reminds me a lot of the KC Offense with Trent Greene, Priest Holmes, and TG. That offense was lacking big-time WR's too (maybe not to the extent that we are). The main difference? They had a great TE to keep LB's honest and to give them big plays.
6. OC. Henning is ok. He's not as bad as our DC, but with all of our FO's connections, we can easily snag a talented young OC.
Go on:
2. WR. I'd rather have a Marshall or Jackson than have to roll the dice a talented rookie, but either way, we need a #1.
3. ILB. The 3-4 should provide plenty of opportunity for ILB's to make big-time plays. Our ILB's never do. Spikes and McClain come to mind.
4. Safety. I'm a bit hesitant on this one, because I think our Safeties played well in the first half - when they were put in positions to do what they do well. But, they're still not versatile enough.
5. TE. Our offense reminds me a lot of the KC Offense with Trent Greene, Priest Holmes, and TG. That offense was lacking big-time WR's too (maybe not to the extent that we are). The main difference? They had a great TE to keep LB's honest and to give them big plays.
6. OC. Henning is ok. He's not as bad as our DC, but with all of our FO's connections, we can easily snag a talented young OC.
Go on: