pick only 1 b.j ,mathews or fuller.... | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

pick only 1 b.j ,mathews or fuller....

Hey guys did anyone notice that BJ is short for blowjob? Lol how original lol

But seriously at this point you have to say Fuller is the favorite. I personally think Mathews is the best prospect out of all of them, but Fuller knows the offense, has shown ability to be a solid #2 WR (which is what the WCO requires) and has the size you desire above all.

Mathews is faster than his combine 40. He's shifty. He's got good hands. He's versatile. BJ has fantastic hands but is a genuine 4.6 player.
 
I would say Cunningham. Every Michigan St. game that I watched, I've heard his name called constantly.
 
hooshoops said:
you want run after the catch in a wco...not run down after the catch...bess has great short area initial quickness which helps him separate at the los but once the balls in his hands he gets run down like a stampede...

nothing against bess he's a nice pro player but you wouldn't get very much in trade for him if you put him on the block...
Click to expand...

Well, the same argument was made about Wes Welker when we traded him to NE...Too slow, limited as a slot guy only, etc...look how he did in a similar offense ?? Admittedly, Welker is faster than Bess, but neither are burners..,
 
KTOWNFINFAN said:
The one single trait that a WR needs to make it in a WCO, is great hands. Fuller has horrible hands, I don't see Fuller being on the roster past the first preseason game. JMO
Click to expand...

He was projected to be a 1st round pick before his senior season in that same WCO we will run here in Miami. So, I guess at some point during his college career, he used to have great hands to get the scout's attention..
 
BenchFiedler said:
He was projected to be a 1st round pick before his senior season in that same WCO we will run here in Miami. So, I guess at some point during his college career, he used to have great hands to get the scout's attention..
Click to expand...

Scouts fall in love with measurables. Fueller has those.


I would go with Cunningham. All the highlights I have seen show he is a baller and he has been consistently for 4 years now
 
You have to see them play. Fuller apparently had injury problems that messed him up senior year. I'm skeptical because they were foot and back injuries and he didn't look slower, he looked like someone broke his fingers. I think all three make it just for the sake of development. Maybe one or two make it on special teams? I also don't think fasano will be around much longer.
 
I think Matthews has to be the one with the most upside and very well could wind up being the best of the group. Philbin compared him to a James Jones type but I think he has better hands than Jones. Matthews is raw and does need some developement in some areas. Cunningham just seemed to make plays in his collegiate career, although I do think his timed speed of 4.6 is his actual playing speed and this could be a detriment for him at the next level.Fuller had a exceptionall junior season at A&M but did have many drops his senior year. It's being said he was injured and this could be the case but what bothers me more with him is all I've ever really seen him run are sideline outs and comeback patterns. All three guys have intriguing parts to their game as well as questions and this is why I could see them all kept around in some capacity. As far as any of them making the final roster, only time will tell. The one reciever I am interested in seeing what he can do in this system other than these guys is Julius Pruitt.
 
Yup, I'll say Mathews as well. The kid can definitely come in a produce right away in this system.
 
Wolfpack alumni so I have to go with Matthews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom