We're not going to become relevant without good leadership both in the front office and in the locker room. Right now we have neither. It would be a good thing if, in Incognito's absence, a couple of players of better character filled the void. It would also be a smart move if Incognito were to return that he be removed from any kind of leadership role; it was a huge mistake to have ever put him in that position.
Leadership is not as simple as who plays what position well. Leaders have to also be selected with some emphasis on strength of character. When a team assigns someone to a leadership position, the message to the other players is this is someone to emulate both on and off the field. While Incognito may have been capable on the field, he came to us with a long history of behaviors that have made him unwelcome at every stop in his career. That Philbin made the decision to put Incognito in a leadership role is, in my opinion, a serious lapse in judgment on his part. The better move would have been to encourage Incognito to emulate the behavior of a person of better character. That would have been better for the team and for Incognito. I think it's fairly easy to make the argument that by putting Incognito in a leadership role, Philbin was setting him up to fail. That just wasn't a role Incognito could navigate with any kind of consistent success. And if there was no better person on the team to take on the role assigned to Incognito, that's Ireland's failure.