How many sack machine really are very good at dropping into coverage or stopping the run??
Not that many would be my guess.
Not many at all. The first person that popped into my head was Charles Hailey. State of the art pass rusher. Not much else...But that's not a bad thing. Not every OLB can be James Harrison.
How many sack machine really are very good at dropping into coverage or stopping the run??
Not that many would be my guess.
He's a pass RUSHER!!! Not a run stuffer, thats for the big boys inside and the D End's. His job is to rush the passer and last year he did it quite well.I do not dislike Porter. He is good at rushing the passer, nothing else.
He is terrible against the run, and as bad against the pass. For the 17 sacks we got, how many other plays did he give up?
Opinions?
Why? His job is to rush the passer, that's what OLB's in a 3-4 are for.
I do not dislike Porter. He is good at rushing the passer, nothing else.
He is terrible against the run, and as bad against the pass. For the 17 sacks we got, how many other plays did he give up?
Opinions?
JT should see the field before Porter IMO. Porter should be the passing-downs-only player and JT should be the every-down player. I believe JT is better against the run than Porter.
I do not dislike Porter. He is good at rushing the passer, nothing else.
He is terrible against the run, and as bad against the pass. For the 17 sacks we got, how many other plays did he give up?
Opinions?
Really? Then why exactly do we have Matt Roth playing OLB? Because of his stellar pass rushing ability?