Puts Parker’s Performance In Perspective
- Thread starter SkapePhin
- Start date
But people want to cut DVP, SMH.
Who, specifically?
Tiko377
Active Roster
This is just in there rookie year...who cares?
Parker still made of glass
Landry over Parker all day
Parker still made of glass
Landry over Parker all day
Just find the thread about his broken finger and you'll find what you are looking for.
FINSItalia
God of Thunder, not a bad gig
Good argument for not drafting a WR in the 1st unless he's a generational talent. Only Amari looks like potential pro-bowler off that list, although some still have time.
gregorygrant83
Active Roster
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Messages
- 12,066
- Reaction score
- 13,445
I think the point is that Parker's rookie year, and years 2 and 3 as well, weren't that bad compared to other receivers taken in the first round in recent years.
Sure thing, I'll do the work to prove your statement.
He's not going to get cut because of his contract. We gain nothing from it. It's certainly not because of produ...oh ****, he he stubbed his toe mid-sentence and is out 5 weeks.
He needs to produce this year or he absolutely will be cut.
LoneStarPhin
Active Roster
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,567
- Reaction score
- 1,713
i'll make the call. unless we could actually trade him for something.
What's the benefit? Doesn't help the cap at all.
Ok. I certainly don't think he's been a complete bust (in the Yatil Green, Charles Rogers class), but I'm as frustrated as the next guy that he hasn't taken it to the next level, epecially after an improved second year. Maybe Tannehill missing the entire year affected his play last year. When he's right, he makes plays. Just want to see him be the Alpha receiver that this team needs.
I know he isn't going to get cut.
Do the work to prove my statement? I gave you the thread to look in to prove my statement. WTF is up your arse? I'm not making this up just to troll, people are always taking shots at him.
I'm also wondering what are you going to do when you find out who specifically. Like why ask that question? LOL
Like, because people like you make baseless statements like that all the time. At least you didn't say "Finheaven wants him cut!1!!" or "half the board wants him cut," which is the usual nonsense used, so thank you for that. Maybe there are people who think he should be cut, but they likely don't know the contract situation, which is the only reason he isn't being cut due to the dead cap. You act as if the stats provided in the tweet put Parker in a good light and is justification for keeping him. They absolutely do not. The ONLY reason for keeping him is that there is no financial benefit to cutting him, so might as well see if he starts giving a **** this year rather than pay $3+ million.
People are taking shots at him because as of now, he's more likely to be a bust than a star. And he's fragile as ****. He has one year to change that.
I never make baseless statements so IDK where you get that BS from. I told you exactly the thread I read it in and you want to whine about doing work to prove my point. FOH with that BS dude. You are just labeling people for no good reason.