im just curious, can you tell me the 3 games ''moore cost us 100 percent ''like u make it seem he did?
i think i know which ones u r going to say, so tell me if im right.
bronco game- ok, did the offense light it up? no. however, we had a freaking 15-0 lead with under 5 minutes to go against arguably one of the worst qbs in the nfl, and especially true at the time we played tebow which was his 1st start of the year. the guy couldnt hit **** the entire game, missed wide open guys downfield, and we had a 15 -0 lead. blaming moore fully for that game and letting the defense off the hook would be like matt moore throwing for 300 yds, 3 tds and 0 ints through 3 qtrs and than in the 4th qtr going 4-14, throwing 2 ints including a pick 6 to lose. would you say moore played well if that were the case? NO, u would say he choked which would be correct. well that is the same thing the defense did, they allowed a lethargic denver offense which looked like a jv high school offense put up 15 points in under 5 minutes to tie the game , including a 2 pt conversion. this to a qb who is arguably the worst throwing qb in the nfl. Moore deff was not lights out that day and no one was saying he was, but to say he was the ''reason'' we lost that game is ridiculous.
game 2- cowboys. again, moore started off strugglish, then looked good at times and then so. he was solid that day, not great, not awful. However, same thing for the denver game, as much as u bring up moores missed passes, he left the field with the lead with under 2 minutes to go. the defense played well at times, but they also choked if u recall, including various times having romo sacked for a huge loss only to let him run free and complete big yard plays and continue drives. again, moore wasnt great that day, but considering the team and environment, and the day being thanksgiving where the cowboys are especially hard to beat, he didnt play awful, and to say the soul purpose of that loss was on moore and defense has no responsibility, would be like saying that a qb who played great for 3 qtrs but in the 4th shat the bed with 2 ints, including a pick 6, has no responsibility for the loss. that was how the defense pretty much was.
game 3- i assume u r talking about the pats game. he started off great, we were up 17-0 at half if i recall, and again, defense choked. now did Moore played great in the 2nd half? no. however, we had a 17-0 lead in foxboro going into the half, we scored 24 pts, but the defense couldn't get a stop.
i believe u win and lose a team, just like the games we won with moore he was a big part of some of them, but im not going to sit here despite me liking him and say he was 100 percent the reason we won and not give any credit to any other parts of the team. well i think the same thing goes for a loss, although he deff fumbles alot which i a very legit concern, to say he is 100 percent the reason we lost those games, rather than direct any blame to any part of the team, including the defense which chokes away a 15 pt lead to one of the most lethargic defenses i had seen on a football field in nfl history that day, i think is a very unfair way to look at the whole picture, but then again, i cant change your opinion.
