Rich
Seasoned Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2005
- Messages
- 962
- Reaction score
- 1
http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/PYDS/2005/pre
Rosenfels: 108
Berlin: 95.5
Frerotte: 84.6
Feeley: 42.7
Rosenfels: 108
Berlin: 95.5
Frerotte: 84.6
Feeley: 42.7
PHINSfan said:Amazing that Frerotte's numbers are 2x better than Feeley's!
islandah said:Not amazing to me... I watched the games and their play reflects it. The sad thing is that the 2X score is still not all that great!
gus thus far has played mostly 1st stringers and alittle 2nd stringers ...PhinsPhan said:77 I think was the average player when the system was first designed. 80 is above average. I think anything above 83 is decent 86 makes good and 89 and above is great.
But the QB rtg doesn't mean anything when you are playing 3rd and 4th stringers as opposed to playing 1st team defenses.
mike_vee said:gus thus far has played mostly 1st stringers and alittle 2nd stringers ...
BringBackShula said:Yup. Just like Feeley has.. ANd that's quite a difference in #'s eh?
Losman7 said:sure it is QB ratings in the 80's are pretty decent.
I mean Losman's sweet and he's got an 87
Alex Smith sux...his rating is 42. What a waste of a draft pick. :DJustasportsfan said:what was Mannings qb rating in the last game? Those ratings mean nothing.
WharfRat said:I don't recall this thread being about Buffalo's QB. You really don't have to make every thread you post in about the Bills......
:shakeno: