QB's Under Pressure | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

QB's Under Pressure

I presume your auto correct meant pressure? :up:
 
Roman529 said:
I presume your auto correct meant pressure? :up:
Click to expand...

lol Yeah, typing new threads is a pain. I don't know the difference between that and replies but, there most definitely is one. Typing letters does not register a bunch of times, and I have to go back a bunch to correct. Sometimes, I just say to hell with it and post, intending to edit which is easier after posting.

Any advice on this would be very welcome.
 
I'm curious to see the charts that lead them to rank Tannehill as better under pressure than Aaron Rodgers. On its face, it's an absolutely ridiculous statement. That's not a knock on Tannehill, but we're talking about Aaron Rodgers.
 
I don't have the time, but at a quick glance, only two QBs in the top 10 of that list made the playoffs.
 
j-off-her-doll said:
I'm curious to see the charts that lead them to rank Tannehill as better under pressure than Aaron Rodgers. On its face, it's an absolutely ridiculous statement. That's not a knock on Tannehill, but we're talking about Aaron Rodgers.
Click to expand...

Most likely because PFF and what they use to determine pressure...
 
I'd like to see all QBs time to get the ball away. My impression is Tannehill holds the ball too long. That combined with a poor line is not good. I may be wrong, it's just what i sense watching the games.
 
j-off-her-doll said:
Yeah, it's just funny. If you aske 32 NFL HC's who is better under pressure, Ryan Tannehill or Aaron Rodgers, you're going to get the same response 32 times.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure Tannehill would even say..."oh yeah...ol number 12 over there"

---------- Post added at 08:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:54 PM ----------
WaxOn WaxOff said:
I'd like to see all QBs time to get the ball away. My impression is Tannehill holds the ball too long. That combined with a poor line is not good. I may be wrong, it's just what i sense watching the games.
Click to expand...

Those number have been posted on here before and I think the conclusion was he gets the ball away faster then a majority on the NFL (top 5 even)
 
j-off-her-doll said:
I'm curious to see the charts that lead them to rank Tannehill as better under pressure than Aaron Rodgers. On its face, it's an absolutely ridiculous statement. That's not a knock on Tannehill, but we're talking about Aaron Rodgers.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing that the number of times under pressure has something to do with it. Rogers was under pressure much less, and as it is a grade by play had many fewer plays to be graded on the positive, which he surely would have done.
 
Is anyone else surprised at how average Tannehill was with no pressure?
 
ConvenientTruth said:
No, I think it confirms what can be seen on film and in his stats...
Click to expand...

So, the PFF ranking on Tannehill without pressure confirms what can be seen on film and in his stats, but that PFF ranking on Tannehill under pressure??? Well, that's just gotta be ridiculous.

"Damage control was the name of the game for Ryan Tannehill who faced the eighth-highest percentage of pressure in the league, yet managed to rank third when normalized. For a quarterback facing that much pressure, his seven touchdowns, four interceptions, and 76.7 passer rating could have looked much worse."


Didn't PFF rank him #7 or so overall passer a year or two ago as well?? Funny how it works when you want it to.
 
russianbear said:
So, the PFF ranking on Tannehill without pressure confirms what can be seen on film and in his stats, but that PFF ranking on Tannehill under pressure??? Well, that's just gotta be ridiculous.

"Damage control was the name of the game for Ryan Tannehill who faced the eighth-highest percentage of pressure in the league, yet managed to rank third when normalized. For a quarterback facing that much pressure, his seven touchdowns, four interceptions, and 76.7 passer rating could have looked much worse."


Didn't PFF rank him #7 or so overall passer a year or two ago as well?? Funny how it works when you want it to.
Click to expand...

Tannehill is also very safe with the ball and will often succumb to sacks and/or throw the ball away. He really isn't a guy that takes many chances . . . which can be a good or bad thing. This is just one of many angles to view a stat like this.

You really have to add in sacks, fumbles and completion percentage for all candidates to really get a true feel for how they fair.

Still it's good to see Tannehill rank so highly in this aspect of pressure.
 
russianbear said:
So, the PFF ranking on Tannehill without pressure confirms what can be seen on film and in his stats, but that PFF ranking on Tannehill under pressure??? Well, that's just gotta be ridiculous.

"Damage control was the name of the game for Ryan Tannehill who faced the eighth-highest percentage of pressure in the league, yet managed to rank third when normalized. For a quarterback facing that much pressure, his seven touchdowns, four interceptions, and 76.7 passer rating could have looked much worse."


Didn't PFF rank him #7 or so overall passer a year or two ago as well?? Funny how it works when you want it to.
Click to expand...

I think for a few weeks it did...It may have even been those awful three weeks he started the season...

Yes...he is exceptional at pushing the ball on the moves, which would most likely count as part of that pressure, one of this strengths...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom