Radical Femminists attacking Dolphins | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Radical Femminists attacking Dolphins

I never liked the Elam signing. Saban is signing too many troubled players. Before you know it, the Dolphins will be getting comparisons with the Raiders. I hope he knows what he's doing.
 
FISHFAN44 said:
We are obviously off track here. Ok there has been men abused by their wives i never heard of it but hey i guess it could happen. The point I am making is that randy should not be getting treated any different that any other wife of husband beater thats all.

YOUR POINT WAS WELL TAKEN I STRONGLY AGREE
 
Calgaryfin said:
"Cawanna McMichael, who had several drops of blood on her shirt, told police that she had accidental contact with her husband. "

Read the story girls! A direct quote from the news!

OF COURSE SHE TOLD POLICE THAT SHE PROBABLY DOESNT WANT HER A** BEAT AGAIN
 
Who is "Elam"? Is he a UDFA or was he a backup on the team in 2004 or a guy that was on the practice squad?
 
Calgaryfin said:
"Cawanna McMichael, who had several drops of blood on her shirt, told police that she had accidental contact with her husband. "

Read the story girls! A direct quote from the news!

Like maybe shes afraid to say the truth. Like that's never happened before. How do you think a women gets repeatedly beaten. Unfortunate to them they are to afraid that he will come back to get her or hoplessly thinking he'll change.
 
Calgaryfin said:
I always find it amazing how certain people read into everything and come out with their own take on it but can't read the words on the line!:rofl3:


I don't think it's the case in this situation, but it is beyond well-documented that many victims of abuse will claim "an accident" because they don't want the abuse to continue.

It's not that we can't read. We just realize that sometimes, there's more to read than what is said.
 
Calgaryfin said:
I always find it amazing how certain people read into everything and come out with their own take on it but can't read the words on the line!:rofl3:

I HOPE SOMEONE IS LIFE HAS TAUGHT YOU NOT TO BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ !

JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY YOU WOULD TAKE SIDES WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS REPEATEDLY DONE THIS I WOULD UNDERSTAND IF THIS WAS NEW NEWS BUT IT ISNT HE OBVIOUSLY HAS A PROB SO WHY WOULD U SIDE W HIM IM A DOLFINS FAN TILL I DIE BUT THAT DOESNT MEAN I CONDONE THIS OR LOOK THE OTHER WAY HE IS A MAN HE SHOULD KNOW BETTER AND HOPEFULLY SO ARE YOU SO WHY DEFEND HIM ?
 
Read into it what you want. Geez maybe McMike has brain swelling from Lyme disease that caused him to act out and we should feel sorry for him too. I know the article didn't say that but, hey, who knows why people do things right.

"Cawanna McMichael, who had several drops of blood on her shirt, told police that she had accidental contact with her husband. "

Read the story girls! A direct quote from the news!



Listen I don't belittle or support domestic violence or absue by either party. However, make no mistake there is an element on this board trying to disrupt things since the Elam signing. :yell:
 
You can read every single post i have even made and i have never even dropped a comment on the elam signing . I just dont understand why someone would pull a far fetched idea maybe brain swelling from lyme disease come on now !!!! get a grip lets a little logic atleast here how about maybe he had to much to drink and couldnt handle himself !!!! or a little devil perched on his shoulder and said punch her dude she's nutts lol how about that
 
What amazes is me, is that reading some of these posts is like stumbling into a blood-baying mob on their way to a witch-hunt.

Here's a radical idea:
Step 1: CHARGE the accused
Step 2: CONVICT the accused
Step 3: allow the accused to SERVE his punishment
Step 4: following the completion of any of the above steps, assess whether the accused still has value to the organisation
Step 5a: If NO to step 4, cut/waive, etc
Step 5b: If YES to step 4, help the accused to put things in order, and move on...

I know, I know. This is the most outrageous idea for a judicial system, to ever be conceived by a member of civilised culture!

Call me crazy, but I'm prepared to allow McMichael due process, before sticking his head on a pike in the Tower of London.
 
Welshfin said:
What amazes is me, is that reading some of these posts is like stumbling into a blood-baying mob on their way to a witch-hunt.

Here's a radical idea:
Step 1: CHARGE the accused
Step 2: CONVICT the accused
Step 3: allow the accused to SERVE his punishment
Step 4: following the completion of any of the above steps, assess whether the accused still has value to the organisation
Step 5a: If NO to step 4, cut/waive, etc
Step 5b: If YES to step 4, help the accused to put things in order, and move on...

I know, I know. This is the most outrageous idea for a judicial system, to ever be conceived by a member of civilised culture!

Call me crazy, but I'm prepared to allow McMichael due process, before sticking his head on a pike in the Tower of London.

I never said he was guilty or not guilty. What got me going is mostly everyone is willing to forget what he did because he's a valuable player and want to make excuses. Whereas the other guy should be strung up and thats because he's a nobody and he should if he's guilty as should Randy again IF he's guilty. This is not a a matter of what's right or wrong it's what will win us a SB no matter what the cost. And thats BS. That's what got me into this post. It's amasing what people will over look to get a head.
 
FISHFAN44 said:
I never said he was guilty or not guilty. What got me going is mostly everyone is willing to forget what he did because he's a valuable player and want to make excuses. Whereas the other guy should be strung up and thats because he's a nobody and he should if he's guilty as should Randy again IF he's guilty. This is not a a matter of what's right or wrong it's what will win us a SB no matter what the cost. And thats BS. That's what got me into this post. It's amasing what people will over look to get a head.

I would defend any man in this situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom