i knew fin-atic would be against, because he solely looks at stats. he probably didnt bother reading my post because hes been anti ramsey all along. He wants an immediate star, he would have been against starting tom brady, he would have been against trading for brett favre because both were nothing or mediocre in their prior careers.
rivers may not fall to us and we shouldnt trade up to get him. Henson hasnt played in four years, do you know anyone who is in the top1% of the worlds population like NFL players are. it's not common to get to the nfl, let alone take 3 years off and become a star immediately.
ramsey just makes the most sense. Youre using his numbers over his first 3 years and comparing them to fiedler despite the fact that fiedler had better talent around him and teams always trying to stop the run. whereas ramsey had a worse team around him and teams always playing the pass. That right there is a little boost in numbers. Add to that the fact that our blocking schemes wont get him killed. Fiedler was sacked 11 less times last year(still fumbled roughly the same amount) and O-line was awful, that tells you how much worse the skins was. He turns the ball over less, dont you realize that just those things there equate to probably 1 or 2 more wins and we havent even begin to discuss the other positives. 1-2 more wins is all we need to get to the playoffs, then it's anyones game.
Also, you know hes gonna work hard with a good QB coach in mark trestman because he wants to prove a lot of people in washington that they made a huge mistake.
let's get it done for the right price Rick
as i've said all along if the price for ramsey is a first rounder this year adn the price for henson is a 3rd next year then it makes the decision tougher, but i hope to be rooting for ramsey in 2005.
We don't need a peyton manning to win the super bowl with this team. Patrick Ramsey is just enough of an upgrade for the current team with the potential to be great for our future