Receiver rotation | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Receiver rotation

Austin Tatious

Starter
Club Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
8,266
Reaction score
9,006
It has only been one pre-season game. And, the Dolphins quarterback rotation has been anything but stable. But this receiving corps is a major problem.

Honestly, after looking at 2 plus years of Hagan and four seasons of Wilford's body of work, neither is reliable and certainly not "explosive."
You could argue that Hagan is about to emerge, and hopefully he will. But the kid has dropped a ton of balls at Arizona State and in his first two years. He is what he is. A bad player. Maybe he can get stats on a bad team. But he is not the answer on a good team.

Wilford is slow and unreliable. He is good for 40 catches. Backup type.

So who starts? We need Ginn to emerge. Unlike Hagan, he has excellent hands. He has good straight line speed, but he needs some more wiggle and to improve his route running. Sparano says he needs to play fast before he catches the ball. But he starts and hopefully he can turn himself into a solid number 2 receiver.

I guess for now, you start Hagan and Ginn and bring Kircus and Wilford off the bench. Bess as the 5th receiver.

But if Kircus keeps playing tough and Hagan remains inconsistent, I'd give Kircus more opportunity.

And Fasano needs to make himself more available in the passing game in view of the poor receiving corps.
 
I think they kind of knew going into this thing that the WRs were not going to be enough, but they focused on one thing at a time. First work on the lines, then work on the skill guys.
 
Honestly, I'd like to see whether Kircus can get open against starting NFL corners. That is something he has never had to prove in games. If he could do it, maybe he is better than Hagan or Wilford. I know that is thinking outside the box, but I'd like to at least see the opportunity. Maybe my view is borne out of frustration with Hagan/Wilford.

I think Ginn ultimately could be for this offense what Alvin Harper was to Dallas in the 1990s. Harper was huge at 6'3, and nothing like Ginn physically, but he was a classic big play guy. If we could get a solid 80 catch number one receiver, Ginn could come in and kill you the way Harper did with the big play.

I'd like us to make a big time free agent receiver acquisition AND use a number one or number 2 pick at receiver.
 
as of right now i would probably put the 5 as ginn hagan wilford (blocker) camarillo and bess. but if Kircus keeps having good preseason he'll get in there
 
Kircus's name keeps popping up....that's a good thing

Actually it's funny because before the game, Kircus' name was nowhere to be found and all indications were he was dropping. Then he goes into the game, makes two good catches on Chad Henne balls, and all the sudden people (meaning journalists) are pretending he's been making plays the entire time.
 
Kircus really came to play. Armstrong looks likehe should be our return guy for sure. Hagan is starting to look like he's coming around.

Ginn, and Wilford were disappointing. Bess unfortunately didn't really have good passes thrown his way.. and Foster.. well.. I think hegets cut based on Saturdays performance.
 
I've seen a lot of people saying they are disappointed in Ginn after the first game but he didn't have many balls thrown to him and he was out of the game pretty quick.
 
it still seems to me after last game that we are still in need of a numer 1 receiver.

we have a nice number 2 in Ginn. hehehehe #2....sorry long day

and 3,4,5's in Kircus, Camerillo, Hagan, Bess and Wilford.

I know it's only been one game but I was really looking for Ginn, Hagan or Wilford to really show they had this thing covered.

Hopefully another week of practice can really get them together for this Saturday's game......it is this Saturday correct?
 
it still seems to me after last game that we are still in need of a numer 1 receiver.

we have a nice number 2 in Ginn. hehehehe #2....sorry long day

and 3,4,5's in Kircus, Camerillo, Hagan, Bess and Wilford.

I know it's only been one game but I was really looking for Ginn, Hagan or Wilford to really show they had this thing covered.

Hopefully another week of practice can really get them together for this Saturday's game......it is this Saturday correct?

Ok just a fact..I know we don't have Tom Brady..But New England won the superbowl with no-name receivers
When they had big name receivers (Moss, Stallworth) they loss the biggest game..so ..Take it with a grain of salt
We need a system that works based on the players/talents we got, who can execute..We should be fine with Ginn, Hagan, Kirkus, Fasano, and Bess..
Let's judge after 1 regular season game
 
Ok just a fact..I know we don't have Tom Brady..But New England won the superbowl with no-name receivers
When they had big name receivers (Moss, Stallworth) they loss the biggest game..so ..Take it with a grain of salt
We need a system that works based on the players/talents we got, who can execute..We should be fine with Ginn, Hagan, Kirkus, Fasano, and Bess..
Let's judge after 1 regular season game


They had receivers that made plays consistantly though. That's where it seems we are lacking consistancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom