It does. This is the interesting thing about Finheaven. On the majority of topics and threads it is either 1 extreme or the other.
Bluefin, in his original post, even stated that it was atleast a positive. But, apparently he is not allowed to be skeptical of Bush's words? That makes no sense,. We know first hand what DC'S may or may not do in preseason. We have a DC who keeps his plans vanilla in preseason. Other DC'S do it to. So after 2 preseason games 1 being a poor performance and 1 being a good performance, and 25 days with Bush is it not ok for Bluefin or myself or anyone else to be skeptical? He acknowledged it atleast was a positive.
Where is the grey area? Why does it have to be an agenda because he is skeptical? It's 2 extremes. It's like our current govenrment. You are either left or you are right, very few independants.
I think it is encouraging, but I have also seen the last 2 years. It's hard for me to not be skeptical based on the last 2 years. When I see him being consistant and not just 1 good game after a bad 1 then I might start taking it for serious. When he plays an actual regular season game, and does good against real defensive schemes and not water downed or project defenses then I will start believing it.
Until then Bluefin and myself and everyone else has a right to be skeptical and take it with a grain of salt. It's nice that these players are saying it, but we heard it last year too and looked what happened.
Until then, it's a skeptical positive