Yeah, that's just my "preconceptions of the situation". What are you high? Jamaal Charles was one of the best running backs last year, please tell me you just didn't compare him to Reggie Bush. Bush should have never been slated to receive 70% of the carries on any roster. Only Sparano and his idiot homers would think it was a good idea.
Let's just put the cards on the table here. You think it was a good idea to feature Bush as the #1 back. It's okay, you can admit you're wrong. Most of the other homers have stepped up to the plate already.
How does that go against my argument? You say Charles is one of the best backs in the NFL, and I pointed out that coach speak had him number 2 all last year. The point is, the real barometer is on the field, because the coach is gonna give due deference to the veteran in speech but the real barometer is on the field. Charles was clearly the guy in KC, and even Thomas Jones knew that.