Reggie Bush | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Reggie Bush

regiie bush is going to have a awesome year we are finally going to use him right not only handing him the ball but screen passes one of his best treats he has great hands and didnt utilize that last year this year we will and he will be an all purpose back which he is more than capable of being....
 
In no particular order, I'd take the following over Bush if there was a draft.

Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
Arian Foster
Mojo Drew
LeSean McCoy
Frank Gore
Micheal Turner
Stephen Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Reshard Mendenhall
DeAngelo Williams
Matt Forte
Darren McFadden

Even have to throw in skittles himself.. Marshawn Lynch.
Coming off of his impressive playoffs 2 years ago... he steamrolled for the last three quarters of this season with one of the most talent deprived teams in the league.

Reggie looked great for a year, but there have been plenty of running backs who show flashes of great play for a year... and then recede the following year.

Time will tell, i still think he belongs in the 10-14 range.
 
In no particular order, I'd take the following over Bush if there was a draft.

Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
Arian Foster
Mojo Drew
LeSean McCoy
Frank Gore
Micheal Turner
Stephen Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Reshard Mendenhall
DeAngelo Williams
Matt Forte
Darren McFadden

Basically correct and as you look at that list, one thing jumps out:

This league is almost DEVOID of top-level superstar RB talent right now. NONE of those guys fits the mold of the great HOF-type RB's of the last 30-40 years. There is no Emmitt Smith- Barry Sanders- like talent out there.

I believe, as much as I despise the guy, Trent Richardson comes in this league as a ROOKIE and is already a top 10 back. If he is there at #9 I would not be against getting him on our team as opposed to having belicheat steal him and us having to play him 2X a season. Because THAT is what's coming folks.

Bush is and always will be, a SITUATIONAL back. We need a top-flite RB. Daniel Thomas is not that. Hard as they are to find, we need one.
 
Basically correct and as you look at that list, one thing jumps out:

This league is almost DEVOID of top-level superstar RB talent right now. NONE of those guys fits the mold of the great HOF-type RB's of the last 30-40 years. There is no Emmitt Smith- Barry Sanders- like talent out there.

I believe, as much as I despise the guy, Trent Richardson comes in this league as a ROOKIE and is already a top 10 back. If he is there at #9 I would not be against getting him on our team as opposed to having belicheat steal him and us having to play him 2X a season. Because THAT is what's coming folks.

Bush is and always will be, a SITUATIONAL back. We need a top-flite RB. Daniel Thomas is not that. Hard as they are to find, we need one.

I get what you're saying and it's true for the most part, but those kind of backs have never been in a surplus. And AP is definitely on that tier
 
Basically correct and as you look at that list, one thing jumps out:

This league is almost DEVOID of top-level superstar RB talent right now. NONE of those guys fits the mold of the great HOF-type RB's of the last 30-40 years. There is no Emmitt Smith- Barry Sanders- like talent out there.

I believe, as much as I despise the guy, Trent Richardson comes in this league as a ROOKIE and is already a top 10 back. If he is there at #9 I would not be against getting him on our team as opposed to having belicheat steal him and us having to play him 2X a season. Because THAT is what's coming folks.

Bush is and always will be, a SITUATIONAL back. We need a top-flite RB. Daniel Thomas is not that. Hard as they are to find, we need one.

AP is emmit smith/sanders talent, no question about it... it's just about him staying healthy
 
Yeah, lets not get too high on R-Bush just yet.

IF he can build on what he did, stay healthy (Something McFatten hasn't, nor will ever do) then maybe in 2 years you can start talking about him as a legit weapon.

He was a 'legit weapon' this year. WTF, more do you want from him?

Bush had a good year considering the oline problems. This year is a contract year, which in most cases, leads to big things.
 
He was a 'legit weapon' this year. WTF, more do you want from him?

Bush had a good year considering the oline problems. This year is a contract year, which in most cases, leads to big things.


1 good season in 6 does not warrant a trend. As I mentioned, and you ignored, IF he can consistently do what he did for a few more years, then great.
The record books are filled with guys that have 1 great season in their career...most of those names go unmentioned (Except Joe Namath).
 
1 good season in 6 does not warrant a trend. As I mentioned, and you ignored, IF he can consistently do what he did for a few more years, then great.
The record books are filled with guys that have 1 great season in their career...most of those names go unmentioned (Except Joe Namath).

Joe Namath averaged 14.7 yards per completion for his career, which is .7 better than Marino in his best season, the signature year of 1984. It was a gunslinger era with receivers battered and Namath was phenomenal to watch. He had many excellent seasons, hobbling around on woeful knees.

Sigh. I see many fans are still determined to knock and downplay Reggie Bush, regardless who he belongs to. It's been an ongoing theme on this site for years, with posters actually believing he didn't have an extraordinary skill set, and was no more than Lorenzo Booker.

Reggie was used horrendously by the Saints. I still think he has grounds to sue them. Particularly on the road Sean Payton would all but give up on Reggie if his first few touches weren't productive.

If Reggie had been drafted by a grass warm weather team out of college he'd have remained a legend throughout his career. The way it worked out, he took so much grief for not being an inside runner he over reacted to the criticism and bulked up too much, sacrificing some of his natural instincts and elusiveness to try to barrel past defenders when it wasn't necessary, or his best option. Only late last season did he get beyond that and start to run to daylight again.

I think there's some validity to the post earlier in this thread that Daboll used Reggie very creatively, and Philbin may not follow suit. Green Bay has featured reluctant rushes, the majority of them predictable stretch plays. Reggie applauded Daboll for the variety of ways he was used.

He certainly won't average 5.0 yards per rush again. That requires too many burst plays, which you can't depend on. For one thing, when a team starts 0-7 nothing can be taken at face value from that point forth. I fully grasp that, even as a Reggie booster. Everything fell into place for him, other than missing the final game.

He's an ultra competitive guy, someone who would have fit in beautifully on the early '70s teams. That's an aspect that was always overlooked by Reggie's detractors. The younger fans of this franchise have been brainwashed by too many grinning idiot players who don't really care how many games we win, as long as they can celebrate a sack or catch or pick when down 24-7.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My predictions are that he will have @ 750 yards rushing and 750 yrd recieving this year. I think by Philbin implementing a West Coast offense, we are going to see a lot more screens, halfback passes in the flat, and Bush in the slot. Thomas will get the ball more between the tackles if we can sure up our line and Messam is going to get the short yardage situation. He will be near the top in total yards, but in the 3rd quartile as a runner.......imo.
 
His stats are very similar to LeSean Mccoy who IMO is a top 5 back. Based on last year I would put Reggie Bush top 10 easily.

Including every RB in NFL who had over 1000 yards, Bush had the most YPC.
 
Joe Namath averaged 14.7 yards per completion for his career, which is .7 better than Marino in his best season, the signature year of 1984. It was a gunslinger era with receivers battered and Namath was phenomenal to watch. He had many excellent seasons, hobbling around on woeful knees.

Sigh. I see many fans are still determined to knock and downplay Reggie Bush, regardless who he belongs to. It's been an ongoing theme on this site for years, with posters actually believing he didn't have an extraordinary skill set, and was no more than Lorenzo Booker.

Reggie was used horrendously by the Saints. I still think he has grounds to sue them. Particularly on the road Sean Payton would all but give up on Reggie if his first few touches weren't productive.

If Reggie had been drafted by a grass warm weather team out of college he'd have remained a legend throughout his career. The way it worked out, he took so much grief for not being an inside runner he over reacted to the criticism and bulked up too much, sacrificing some of his natural instincts and elusiveness to try to barrel past defenders when it wasn't necessary, or his best option. Only late last season did he get beyond that and start to run to daylight again.

I think there's some validity to the post earlier in this thread that Daboll used Reggie very creatively, and Philbin may not follow suit. Green Bay has featured reluctant rushes, the majority of them predictable stretch plays. Reggie applauded Daboll for the variety of ways he was used.

He certainly won't average 5.0 yards per rush again. That requires too many burst plays, which you can't depend on. For one thing, when a team starts 0-7 nothing can be taken at face value from that point forth. I fully grasp that, even as a Reggie booster. Everything fell into place for him, other than missing the final game.

He's an ultra competitive guy, someone who would have fit in beautifully on the early '70s teams. That's an aspect that was always overlooked by Reggie's detractors. The younger fans of this franchise have been brainwashed by too many grinning idiot players who don't really care how many games we win, as long as they can celebrate a sack or catch or pick when down 24-7.

Yeah yeah, and he also had 220 INT's to 173 TD's and a below 50% completion for his career.

I know the history, he had one banner year...or actually one banner prediction.
IF they had lost that game, he doesn't SNIFF the HOF without buying a ticket.
 
Reggie Bush is a top 10 back IMO, He has the potential to be the elite back we all thought he was when he came out in 06. He's been one of my favorite players since his college days and i think he'll do wonders in the west coast offense.
 
Back
Top Bottom