People here make no sense.
At least 90% of the posts I read regarding Parker are that he misses too many games, and he has to go, despite the friendly contract.
Now so many of you want to pay top FA LT money to Armstead.
Armstead has played in 77 games the last 7 seasons. Parker has played in 93.
This is a fair point.
All I can say, is for me, Parker doesn't impact the offense the way Armstead would. Parker doesn't keep Tua off the IR. Parker doesn't open that hole on 3rd and 1.
I would be ok with new coaching if Jackson, Eich or whoever needed to fill in for a couple games at LT.
The other aspect is Armstead effects every snap on offense as opposed to getting his 5 or 6 catches.
Additionally, when healthy, Armstead is a pro bowl or All Pro talent. Parker is hit or miss. He disappears at times.
I would rather take a risk on Armstead than a WR who averages 4 or less TDS. A season.
With that said, I am OK keeping Parker. I am OK moving him.
I would much prefer we try to trade him to GB
GB having 22 and 28 scares me. They keep taking WR or Dean right before we pick in my mocks lol.
Just my opinion. But at the end of the day, there's no need to move on from him
Now if a kid like Olave starts sliding to the 20s, Parker should be included in an attempt to trade up. If the other team wants him of course