Claybo is 31.
Exactly, you think he's still getting better at 31? I think we've seen proof this year he is in severe decline. Whats tat say for a 34 year old with major weight problems?
Claybo is 31.
Exactly, you think he's still getting better at 31? I think we've seen proof this year he is in severe decline. Whats tat say for a 34 year old with major weight problems?
Exactly, you think he's still getting better at 31? I think we've seen proof this year he is in severe decline. Whats tat say for a 34 year old with major weight problems?
To say that every NFL player 31 or older is in severe decline would be silly. No time or desire to list hundreds of players you would be wrong on.
Just another thought. Wake is 31 and Grimes is 30. Don't want these old guys on the decline here.
+
Correct, except I didn't say that. I said a a 31 year old Clabo and 34 year old McKinnie with major weight issues, that hasn't played good this year, is in decline. GM's don't trade for 3rd string players that are 34 years old.
Again, I specifically said "guys like McKinnie fall off quickly" at age 34. I didnt say "guys like Grimes". Age is relative to position - and CB is not the same at OT. You dont see many OTs playing well into their mid 30's.
How do you tell? Clabo was the #5 RT last year, and McKennie did a VG job in Baltimore' SB run. Are they dead or, will they play well in a week or so?
Yeah, CB's who rely on speed are longer lasting. C'Mon man. :)
Well I'd disagree that Clabo was a top 5 OT last year, and I also disagree that McKinnie did a VG job, unless you mean the other VG. But the point is this guy had played bad and isn't going to get better, so I'm not sure why we'd trade for him.
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------
They are longer lasting than RTs. Go google it on your PFF page or something...
What did you base your post on?