Reuter four-round mock draft 3.0 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Reuter four-round mock draft 3.0

datruth55

Hungry for defense
Club Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
21,814
Reaction score
4,246
Location
U.S.A.
Danny Isadora is just this years Turner or Thomas. Another looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane guard prospect. I'd much rather have a slobby, fat-tailed, unathletic guard that knows how to block d-linemen, than one of these high metrics kids who is clueless when it comes to playing football.
 
Yeah, I feel like unless a top TE prospect miraculously free falls into our range (i.e. Howard at 22), we aren't drafting a TE in the first two rounds.
 
According to that no de value in round 2 something i tend to agree with although i think when its all said and done demarcus walker will get drafted there

Daeshon hall 3rd round deatrick wise 4th hendrickson late 3 early 4 i all agree with

Taco to detroit in front of us very possible...more lb value in round 2 than de i know that much
 
Danny Isadora is just this years Turner or Thomas. Another looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane guard prospect. I'd much rather have a slobby, fat-tailed, unathletic guard that knows how to block d-linemen, than one of these high metrics kids who is clueless when it comes to playing football.

Turner was an animal in college though. He was exactly what you'd look for in an interior lineman he just didn't transition at all.
 
Julius Thomas and Fasano, why on earth do we need a Tight End in the first few rounds? Aside from the fact that we could have got Martellus Bennett for cheaper than Julius.
 
Turner was an animal in college though. He was exactly what you'd look for in an interior lineman he just didn't transition at all.

Maybe, but it's always a projection even when they play well in college. Thomas was pretty good in college too. And Thomas played in the SEC. Turner was a small school kid. There is always a concern there that they are dominating because of the level of talent they are going against more than their own ability. Not that plenty of talent doesn't come from the FCS programs. It's just a bit harder to place certainty in what you are seeing on tape there. As compared to the other two, Isadora was a disappointment in college. All the more reason to avoid him. I wouldn't look at him before the late 5th, and even then you are taking him based on the physical traits and hoping he will improve with NFL coaching. Very meh to me.
 
43 des thomas, barnett, charlton, willis, walker, hall, hendrickson, wise

Situational rushers in a 43 harris, derek rivers, tim williams ie lots and lots of work to do vs the run to play every down and weight to gain weakside fits pure pass rusher types

Easier projections as 34 olbs in terms of maximum snap counts
 
43 des thomas, barnett, charlton, willis, walker, hall, hendrickson, wise

Situational rushers in a 43 harris, derek rivers, tim williams ie lots and lots of work to do vs the run to play every down and weight to gain weakside fits pure pass rusher types

What are your thoughts on Hendrickson? How late do you think he can be had? I.E., if we went DE in the first and LB in the second round, do you think there is any chance Hendrickson is still around in the third when we pick? Or is he a highly enough thought of prospect that he might be a candidate for us to take in the second round if we went with a lb like Reddick in the first?
 
Maybe, but it's always a projection even when they play well in college. Thomas was pretty good in college too. And Thomas played in the SEC. Turner was a small school kid. There is always a concern there that they are dominating because of the level of talent they are going against more than their own ability. Not that plenty of talent doesn't come from the FCS programs. It's just a bit harder to place certainty in what you are seeing on tape there. As compared to the other two, Isadora was a disappointment in college. All the more reason to avoid him. I wouldn't look at him before the late 5th, and even then you are taking him based on the physical traits and hoping he will improve with NFL coaching. Very meh to me.

Well he combined himself into a likely day 2 pick so you gonna be nervous when that comp 3 comes up if hes on the board
 
Well he combined himself into a likely day 2 pick so you gonna be nervous when that comp 3 comes up if hes on the board

Hendrickson or Isadora? I agree on Hendrickson. I liked him before the combine. The way he moved there only reinforced what you see him do on the field. I was worried he might be a limited athlete excelling in a lesser league (Conf. USA.). Running his 40 as fast as David Njoku I'm sure slid him up some draft boards. The kid plays hard, has decent size, moves well, and produced in college. I'm wondering if he moved further up draft boards than the talking heads realize at this point.
 
What are your thoughts on Hendrickson? How late do you think he can be had? I.E., if we went DE in the first and LB in the second round, do you think there is any chance Hendrickson is still around in the third when we pick? Or is he a highly enough thought of prospect that he might be a candidate for us to take in the second round if we went with a lb like Reddick in the first?

I think hes probably a 75 to 100 value...hes murdered the postseason process is probably a little undervalued...ideal fit 43 de...comp 3 range...along with hall and wise

You get into round 3 without a de thats more in line with what you are gonna be looking at...derek rivers i like as a situational rusher but he might go in the 50 to 75 range for that so where reuter has him makes sense to me

Im doubting demarcus walker makes it to round 3 but how he shows at his pro day will be big for his stock...hes not getting out of day 2 either way but where does he stack up...im guessing top 50 range...very polished but not much outside shoulder win on the edge more interior pass rusher in the sub
 
Back
Top Bottom