ricky still owes | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

ricky still owes

ikes daddy

ikes daddy

Rookie
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I just read on rotowire that ricky still owes the team that 8.1 mill from his retirement and he is making 730,000 this yr plus 90,000 for each game he plays in but the team could go after that money at any time they want.good reason for him to walk the line don't you think?
 
dolpns13 said:
were never getting that money back
Click to expand...
I hope not, Ricky made some bad choices but he always gives 100% in practice and during the game. He was in a horrible situation with dumbstadt runing him into the ground like he did to Lamar Smith. Most carries in a game, and in a season.
 
PB Fin Fan said:
I hope not, Ricky made some bad choices but he always gives 100% in practice and during the game. He was in a horrible situation with dumbstadt runing him into the ground like he did to Lamar Smith. Most carries in a game, and in a season.
Click to expand...

I cant say, i hope not, but lets say im not disappointed that we wont get it back. I mean I dont think it goes toward the salary cap does it? His original contract was through this year, so all things being equal, that doe would have been off the books anyways. I think

And to add insult to injury, Lamar Smith still holds the record for most carries in a playoff game... but that was the game back then.. one running baclk to carry the load. The game has changed now in that very little teams run a 1 back system. The majority of teams have a two back system with 1 primary back and a secondary back who can perform almost at the same level as the primary guy.

I guess the formula, two backs + less carries per back = 100% production and less wear and tear works better than one back + more carries per back = 100% production but more wear and tear
 
dolpns13 said:
I cant say, i hope not, but lets say im not disappointed that we wont get it back. I mean I dont think it goes toward the salary cap does it? His original contract was through this year, so all things being equal, that doe would have been off the books anyways. I think

And to add insult to injury, Lamar Smith still holds the record for most carries in a playoff game... but that was the game back then.. one running baclk to carry the load. The game has changed now in that very little teams run a 1 back system. The majority of teams have a two back system with 1 primary back and a secondary back who can perform almost at the same level as the primary guy.

I guess the formula, two backs + less carries per back = 100% production and less wear and tear works better than one back + more carries per back = 100% production but more wear and tear
Click to expand...

I heartily agree, I truly believe the R & R express can be a dominte tandem for a few years. I still remember after the Colts victory, that idiot Wanny jumping on his back after the game. As I remember Lamar could not get out of bed for two days and had limited practice for the Raiders game which we got killed in part due to no runing game.
 
dolpns13 said:
I cant say, i hope not, but lets say im not disappointed that we wont get it back. I mean I dont think it goes toward the salary cap does it? His original contract was through this year, so all things being equal, that doe would have been off the books anyways. I think

And to add insult to injury, Lamar Smith still holds the record for most carries in a playoff game... but that was the game back then.. one running baclk to carry the load. The game has changed now in that very little teams run a 1 back system. The majority of teams have a two back system with 1 primary back and a secondary back who can perform almost at the same level as the primary guy.

I guess the formula, two backs + less carries per back = 100% production and less wear and tear works better than one back + more carries per back = 100% production but more wear and tear
Click to expand...

Mathematician?
AlbertEinstein-1.jpg
:lol:

That formula is true though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom