finfan54
Active Roster
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2002
- Messages
- 26,168
- Reaction score
- 29
General Tso said:Addressing some of the misconceptions in your post...
Brown is the best receiver of the 3 backs, anyone that's watched all three for the past 3 years would acknowledge that. Brown catches anything thrown to him. Auburn lined him up out wide and he'd catch balls over the shoulder like a WR. Gruden said Brown had the best hands at the combine, better than any of the other RBs, TEs, or WRs.
Brown is the best blocker of the 3 backs, again... anyone that's watched all three for the past 3 years would acknowledge that. Caddy puts in good effort and has had his share of great blocks, but his legs are way too skinny for him to be a great blocker in the NFL. Benson's blocking is one of the negatives most 'experts' critisize him for. As Mike Mayock says, he doesn't seem to be interested in blocking. You can try to downplay it all you want, but having a RB that's a great blocker is important... especially with the immobile QBs we currently have on our roster.
Brown would "never be asked to go long" but Caddy would? That doesn't make any sense. Brown had more 30+ yard runs than Caddy in fewer carries... he's certainly as much or more of a threat to break long runs than Caddy or Benson.
A great running back needs "the team attitude"? Not sure that's a true statement, but even if it is then how does Brown not have the same great team attitude as Caddy?
Bottom line: the ? on Caddy are overblown and the totality of Ronnie Brown are overblown. In the end, I think they are both fine RB's but you cannot deny that Caddy is a different type of RB. You look at all the great RB's in history and you will find more great RB's who shaked and baked as opposed to bullied his way to fame. Benson has more moves to me than Brown but once again, character for the long haul.