quikphish83
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
In Armando Salguero's latest blog entery on Dolphins in Depth, Armando proceeds to perpetuate the common myth that runningbacks improve as they get more carries in a game. I've always been skeptical of this myth because journalists always back it up by comparing games where the back got 20+ carries with games where they got fewer. Inevitably the back would have a better ypc in the games they had more carries. But is this because they got more carries? Or is this simply the fact that when a team can run well, they run often. When a team cant run well, they quit before their primary back can reach the 20 carry mark.
To test this myth I looked at all 14 games since 2005 where Ronnie brown ran the ball at least 20 times (yes there are only 14!) I then compared the average ypc for carries 1-10 of each game with the average ypc of carries 11+.
Guess what I found. Ronnie averaged 4.81 ypc on the first ten runs and 4.68 ypc for carries 11+. Thus this myth is debunked. At least for Ronnie Brown. No one should believe that Ronnie Brown actually gets worse through the game because 4.68 and 4.81 are very similar. I actually ran a simple t-test in excel and found they are not statistically different.
Yes, I had too much time on my hands, but now you know...
To test this myth I looked at all 14 games since 2005 where Ronnie brown ran the ball at least 20 times (yes there are only 14!) I then compared the average ypc for carries 1-10 of each game with the average ypc of carries 11+.
Guess what I found. Ronnie averaged 4.81 ypc on the first ten runs and 4.68 ypc for carries 11+. Thus this myth is debunked. At least for Ronnie Brown. No one should believe that Ronnie Brown actually gets worse through the game because 4.68 and 4.81 are very similar. I actually ran a simple t-test in excel and found they are not statistically different.
Yes, I had too much time on my hands, but now you know...