Ryan Tannehill 4 life, he rulesQB | Page 10 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Ryan Tannehill 4 life, he rulesQB

Wallace17Miami said:
Sorry, I'm just looking for an answer to my question from the RT supporters. They would prefer to take up bandwidth insulting instead of answering.
Click to expand...

What is the difference? People responding or not is still taking up bandwidth by your numerous same-topic threads.
 
WVDolphan said:
Could Tannehill do his job and hit Wallace when he is wide open for a TD?
Click to expand...

so are you gonna merge his threads or not?

---------- Post added at 07:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
PhinzN703 said:
What is the difference? People responding or not is still taking up bandwidth by your numerous same-topic threads.
Click to expand...

merge his threads and send it to the depths
 
PhinzN703 said:
What is the difference? People responding or not is still taking up bandwidth by your numerous same-topic threads.
Click to expand...


Technically if people are not responding it's not taking up anymore bandwidth then me just replying within another thread.

---------- Post added at 07:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 PM ----------
Nawledge said:
so are you gonna merge his threads or not?

---------- Post added at 07:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------



merge his threads and send it to the depths
Click to expand...

mommy mommy help. I'm catching a beatdown.... save me.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
Technically if people are not responding it's not taking up anymore bandwidth then me just replying within another thread.
Click to expand...

why did u need to make 6 different threads to say the same thing for the most part? you couldve made one thread with all of your complaints in the OP. You couldve titled it "Tannehill haters super thread: all complaints here"
 
Nawledge said:
why did u need to make 6 different threads to say the same thing for the most part? you couldve made one thread with all of your complaints in the OP. You couldve titled it "Tannehill haters super thread: all complaints here"
Click to expand...

BEcause you guys avoid answering questions, and turn it into an insult fest instead of a conversation. You are one of the main offenders.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
Still searching for an answer, and we are on page two.

Clearly you guys know I am right.

Cut bait, lets find a qb that has a chance.

---------- Post added at 07:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:19 PM ----------



How many more pass attempts did he have? He should have doubled it... at the very least.

He is in his second season, had way more pass attempts, had more weapons, another season with his OC and team mates.

Guess what else also went up, INTS.

QBR down
Click to expand...

20% more pass attempts means he should AT LEAST double his TDs? And yet with 20% more pass attempts he shouldn't also throw more INTs? Do you even ****ing understand how statistics and probability work? What you should look at is the TD:INT ratio. He went from 12:13 to 24:17. That is massive improvement. Absolutely massive improvement. If he improves at a similar rate from this year to next his stats will be hall-of-famer caliber.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
Technically if people are not responding it's not taking up anymore bandwidth then me just replying within another thread.

---------- Post added at 07:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 PM ----------



mommy mommy help. I'm catching a beatdown.... save me.
Click to expand...

why do u have to make 6 threads all saying the same thing? Make one thread and save some space on the main page. Be a little bit considerate to people who want to discuss other topics.
 
TarHeelFinFan said:
20% more pass attempts means he should AT LEAST double his TDs? And yet with 20% more pass attempts he shouldn't also throw more INTs? Do you even ****ing understand how statistics and probability work? What you should look at is the TD:INT ratio. He went from 12:13 to 24:17. That is massive improvement. Absolutely massive improvement. If he improves at a similar rate from this year to next his stats will be hall-of-famer caliber.
Click to expand...


No talking about improving... you would go the other direction with the INTS. If you can't follow basic logic it's tough to talk to you.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
No talking about improving... you would go the other direction with the INTS. If you can't follow basic logic it's tough to talk to you.
Click to expand...

You're the one that seems to have a problem with logic. You posted one of the stupidest threads in the history of message boards (which is saying something) with the "Tannehill hasn't improved, look at this table that shows he's improved in virtually every single meaningful statistic" thread. Now you are doubling down by starting ten more threads saying the exact same bull****. Tannehill is by no means great yet, but he's a second year QB stuck on a bad team. We have, perhaps, the worst OL ever assembled. We have no RB. Our starting TE shredded his knee before the season even started, and the guy we replaced him with is essentially football's version of a utility player. Our #1 WR is a one trick pony. Our slot receiver shredded his knee midway through the season. Despite all of this Tannehill put up some very respectable numbers. You don't cut bait on a 2nd year QB that put up the numbers Tannehill did on a team lacking in talent pretty much every way possible. You fix more of the holes and see what you have in the kid. He's shown potential, but he's going to need help to fulfill it.
 
TarHeelFinFan said:
You're the one that seems to have a problem with logic. You posted one of the stupidest threads in the history of message boards (which is saying something) with the "Tannehill hasn't improved, look at this table that shows he's improved in virtually every single meaningful statistic" thread. Now you are doubling down by starting ten more threads saying the exact same bull****. Tannehill is by no means great yet, but he's a second year QB stuck on a bad team. We have, perhaps, the worst OL ever assembled. We have no RB. Our starting TE shredded his knee before the season even started, and the guy we replaced him with is essentially football's version of a utility player. Our #1 WR is a one trick pony. Our slot receiver shredded his knee midway through the season. Despite all of this Tannehill put up some very respectable numbers. You don't cut bait on a 2nd year QB that put up the numbers Tannehill did on a team lacking in talent pretty much every way possible. You fix more of the holes and see what you have in the kid. He's shown potential, but he's going to need help to fulfill it.
Click to expand...

People on this site are ridiculous man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom