Now that's funny. Tell me then, who's our next franchise quarterback and please explain how you know he won't be a bust.
In this draft lets go with the TOP 2 QB's on the board. They have the upside and body of work to suggest they can develop into franchise quality starters.
Now you Tannehill fluffers. He struggled against the top talent in the BIG 12. Now you may say he only played a year and half at QB, and I say there is a reason for that. He couldn't beat out the QB's on the depth chart to get there, a depth chart that was in place for ALL of Sherman's tenure.
Stop watching the NorthWestern highlights, or the KU highlights. Look at his work against OU, OKST and MIZZOU. Look at the fact, as a previous article stated, he lost 5 games that TAM was leading at half. And then look at the fact he lead his TOP 10 preseason team to 4 wins in the BIG 12. Unlike you, I watched almost every one of his games. I watched TAM leading big in a few games, only to see them be held in the second half and lose. Watching him lock onto WR at the worst times, throwing crucial picks.
I unlike most here, go by what I see on players like Tannehill. I won't comment on Cousins or Osweiller. But I watch alot of BIG 12 football. And there is a big difference between RGIII and Tannehill. One is ready to be a NFL qb, IMO. And one isn't, IMO.