Ryan Tannehill has Become More Consistently Good Lately | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Ryan Tannehill has Become More Consistently Good Lately

Shouright

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
15,051
Reaction score
18
Age
52
This post is based on the following QB rating numbers for Ryan Tannehill over the course of his career:

GAME #20122013 First 7 Games2013 Last 5 Games
139.082.3
291.0107.4
350.294.5
486.557.9
592.386.1
6112.071.2
750.460.8
890.9 92.6
942.4 84.3
1046.9 84.0
1197.1 86.4
1274.1 94.2
1366.2
14123.2
1593.8
1665.8
AVERAGE76.3680.0388.30
STANDARD DEVIATION25.7917.974.78

Everyone knows what an average is. Not everyone knows what a standard deviation is. It's the average distance from the average of all the values in the dataset.

So what we see above is that in 2012, Ryan Tannehill's QB rating was all over the map. His average QB rating for the season was 76.36, but he posted QB ratings that ranged all the way from 39 to 123.3, again with an average distance from the season average (a standard deviation) of 25.79.

Through the first seven games of 2013, his average QB rating increased to 80.03, and his standard deviation decreased to 17.97. So through roughly the first half of 2013, we see an increase in his QB rating, with a simultaneous decrease in the variability of his QB rating. Or, said differently, we see an increase in his QB rating, with a simultaneous increase in his consistency.

Now here's the kicker: through the last five games, we see another increase in his QB rating -- this time roughly eight points -- to 88.30, which is above the league average, and we see a tremendous decrease in the variability of his QB rating.

In other words, through the last five games, not only has Ryan Tannehill performed better than he has through any five-game stretch in his career, but he's also been far more consistently good during that five-game stretch than he has through any other five-game stretch in his career.

The mark of a truly good player is consistently good play, by and large. Up-and-down play can be largely "fluke" play -- you never know what you're going to get. In other words, significant variability in someone's play prevents an accurate and reliable assessment of his ability.

I'd say the last five games are probably the single biggest sign of Ryan Tannehill's achievement and potential to this point in his NFL career. :up:
 
Nice stats. Thanks. Tannehill has been getting much more consistent and looks more comfortable then he did early on in the season. Im curious to see how he handles the cold tomorrow.
 
His last two games he had over 300 yds passing against two of the better defenses in the league. That in and of itself is improvement.

We also had a bit of a tougher schedule this year than last.

So we can definitely see improvement any way you slice it. Two things caused the earlier lower ratings and that is OL and Wallace not as consistent IMO. I am stoked for the future, unlike others.
 
I think Tannehill could be successful with more help from the offensive play calling. We have to run more and run more plays from under center. Tannehill looks like one of the best in the league off play action. It's one of the few plays I expect a successful outcome as it develops. The delayed handoff from shotgun and the 5 wide empty backfield are the plays were I cringe and have little hope for a positive outcome.
 
I actually think the last 5 games are more a sign of the team around him improving. Better pass protection, Mike Wallace getting more comfortable in the offense, Charles Clay not dropping the football as much.

Sunday's game was not one of his better performances this year, yet it looked good on the stats sheet.
 
So doesn't that pretty much coincide with the arrival of Mckinnie? Now it really does seem like the OL play was actually good but Tannehill just magically started playing better once a real LT arrived...
 
Paper3-1.jpg


i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats.
 
Mt McKinnie has proven considerably harder to breach than Petticoat Junction - and that's a major difference between having your linemen pushed into you and reacting vs having a little more breathing room to be proactive .. and that is also borne out in the decrease in fumbles.
 
Paper3-1.jpg


i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats.

llihennat
 
I think Tannehill could be successful with more help from the offensive play calling. We have to run more and run more plays from under center. Tannehill looks like one of the best in the league off play action. It's one of the few plays I expect a successful outcome as it develops. The delayed handoff from shotgun and the 5 wide empty backfield are the plays were I cringe and have little hope for a positive outcome.
Prior to the Jets game, Tannehill's QB rating off of play-action was 117.3, which put him in the 80th percentile in the league. However, the difference in his QB rating between play-action and non-play-action (42 QB rating points) was in the 93rd percentile in the league.

So he's not necessarily one of the best in the league off of play-action, but the difference in his play off of play-action is certainly one of the biggest in the league.
 
Paper3-1.jpg


i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats. i am not obsessed with ryan tannehill stats.

2i9k185-1.jpg
 
So doesn't that pretty much coincide with the arrival of Mckinnie? Now it really does seem like the OL play was actually good but Tannehill just magically started playing better once a real LT arrived...

Mt McKinnie has proven considerably harder to breach than Petticoat Junction - and that's a major difference between having your linemen pushed into you and reacting vs having a little more breathing room to be proactive .. and that is also borne out in the decrease in fumbles.
Interestingly, however, Tannehill's QB rating on throws made after 2.5 seconds from the snap has decreased by 8 points since October 24th.
 
Interestingly, however, Tannehill's QB rating on throws made after 2.5 seconds from the snap has decreased by 8 points since October 24th.
So maybe, just maybe... the way the pocket evolves for a QB cant be quantified in numbers...
 
Back
Top Bottom