Safety Was Seth's Fault | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Safety Was Seth's Fault

PhinKev

PhinKev

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
1,945
Reaction score
12
Location
Palm Beach
Great game. It was nice to have something to cheer about for a change.

Anyway, I was looking at the safety again on my TIVO because of the thread going on about whether the hit should have been helmet to helmet and a penalty. I'm not sure on that one. Could have been called it seems to me.

Anyway, I noticed that no one on the offensive line actually moved at the snap. I mean no one except for Seth. That's why they got in so fast. Not bad blocking, just basically a false start on the center. Except, that is not a penalty except for the QB.

Seems to me Seth owes Gus an apology for getting him killed.
 
McKinney is the worst center that the Dolphins have ever had. I can't believe that he is still starting for us.
 
Retnuhrace said:
McKinney is the worst center that the Dolphins have ever had. I can't believe that he is still starting for us.
Click to expand...

Mckinney is having a good year.
 
byroan said:
Mckinney is having a good year.
Click to expand...

A "better than expected" year. For all of the positive hype about thie unit, I can't say that any one of them is having a good year. 7 good plays and 2 mess-ups keep you in below average status. I do believe that solid improvement is just a good number of false start penalties away, however. I think that the Oak game was really the first game where the playcalling is allowing the QB to hold the ball just a little bit longer. Good decision, kept Gus healthy (untill the safety.) Also padded the sacks stats for us.
 
I think our line has improved, but I am still not a big fan of Seth's. C and LT need to be upgraded next year. LT first though. Seth is better this year though...
 
three guys got to gus I have a hard time believing that all three went by Seth.
 
FRESHNESS said:
A "better than expected" year. For all of the positive hype about thie unit, I can't say that any one of them is having a good year.
Click to expand...

For Seth, it's a good year.
 
Who really gives a ****? We beat those chokers. Time to move on and get ready for the Chargers.
 
FRESHNESS said:
A "better than expected" year. For all of the positive hype about thie unit, I can't say that any one of them is having a good year. 7 good plays and 2 mess-ups keep you in below average status. I do believe that solid improvement is just a good number of false start penalties away, however. I think that the Oak game was really the first game where the playcalling is allowing the QB to hold the ball just a little bit longer. Good decision, kept Gus healthy (untill the safety.) Also padded the sacks stats for us.
Click to expand...

Then over half of the offensive lines in the NFL are below average.
 
A Wing Pilot said:
three guys got to gus I have a hard time believing that all three went by Seth.
Click to expand...

you might want to reread the post again A Wing, I think you misunderstood it.
 
byroan said:
Mckinney is having a good year.
Click to expand...

I wouldnt go that far...

he is having a good year for being Seth McKinney... :lol:
 
PhinKev said:
Great game. It was nice to have something to cheer about for a change.

Anyway, I was looking at the safety again on my TIVO because of the thread going on about whether the hit should have been helmet to helmet and a penalty. I'm not sure on that one. Could have been called it seems to me.

Anyway, I noticed that no one on the offensive line actually moved at the snap. I mean no one except for Seth. That's why they got in so fast. Not bad blocking, just basically a false start on the center. Except, that is not a penalty except for the QB.

Seems to me Seth owes Gus an apology for getting him killed.
Click to expand...

I saw that too. the whole left side of the line didn't move until the DLs were one step into them. I mean they didn't even flinch! They got into their stance and didn't move. It's like they wanted Gus to get killed. I understand not taking a false start there, but that's over doing it a bit!!! :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom