http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
Great. Just what we need. You would think it wouldnt be a big problem for him to actually play some games and produce in a phins uni before he starts with this stuff.
Btw, I do think he made some good points as to why we chose not to sign Faneca, but did he really pick the best time to come out and say so?
Also, was it necessary to come on the airways(quite possibly under the influence) and answer any questions that have to deal with whether or not tampering was involved? Given that the new commish seems to be a bad ***, wouldnt the best thing to do just be to avoid any comments to such questions? You know, seeing as it was obvious tampering was involved.
Great. Just what we need. You would think it wouldnt be a big problem for him to actually play some games and produce in a phins uni before he starts with this stuff.
NEW FEUD IN THE AFC EAST?
It's too bad that Justin Smiley and Alan Faneca both play offense. Because if they were on the opposite sides of the ball, one of the newest Jets and one of the newest Dolphins would likely be looking for each other when the two teams play twice in 2008.
Smiley recently appeared on 790 The Ticket in Miami, calling in from an Alabama golf course (and apparently under the influence of one or more portable containers of alcoholic beverages). During the segment, a fast-talking -- and at times mouth-breathing -- Smiley took a shot at Faneca, who inked a five-year, $40 million contract in New York.
"First of all, Alan Faneca's ancient," Smiley said. "The guy is about 10 damn years older than me. Anyone can pull some game film up. Go watch all my game film. That'll do the talking.
"Parcells didn't sign Faneca. They had the cap room to do it and didn’t want to do it. There must be some good things that they saw in me."
Smiley apparently was joking, and might have been half (or fully) in the bag. But Faneca is the kind of guy, in our assessment, who won't see the humor in Smiley's remarks.
Btw, I do think he made some good points as to why we chose not to sign Faneca, but did he really pick the best time to come out and say so?
Also, was it necessary to come on the airways(quite possibly under the influence) and answer any questions that have to deal with whether or not tampering was involved? Given that the new commish seems to be a bad ***, wouldnt the best thing to do just be to avoid any comments to such questions? You know, seeing as it was obvious tampering was involved.