So What's Worse? MM Or A 3rd OC? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

So What's Worse? MM Or A 3rd OC?

GoonBoss

Finheaven Templar
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
19,808
Reaction score
116
Location
The Crossroads of TX
I was thinking about this earlier today.

I personally have not liked Mularkey's playcalling at all, however,
I think that a third Offensive Coordinator in as many years would
be counterproductive and damageing.

My personal opinion is that Saban should get a hold on the playcalling
and set up certain parameters for down/distance/situations as
far as the options that MM could go to, and keep him for another year in the name of continuity.

I have, and, still support Saban 100%, but the Offensive coordinator
choices he's made have really put the team behind the 8 ball.
I liked Linehan, but, he was obviously not going to have much longevity.
I shut my eyes and crossed my fingers with the Mularkey hireing, which has turned out badly.
 
I'll take the 3rd OC. When you got MM in there doing his best to lose games, change can not be a bad thing.
 
Depends, lets see how MM calls 'em the rest of this season, if he turns it around, then rather see him stay than another OC change. But, he has to improve drastically or I want him outa here!
 
How many O.C. 's have we had the last five years?5
 
This subject does worry me a bit. I'm getting sick of seeing Chambers have to learn a new system. We are holding him so far back that it's sick. He needs to get into a system he's comfortable with so he can give us a full 16 games of greatness. But then again, Mularky is the worst OC in the NFL. It's a real bind if you ask me, but Mularky has to go.
 
Namor said:
How many O.C. 's have we had the last five years?5

and how many times has the next one worked? none....so why not give MM another chance and see what happens
 
MARINO1384 said:
and how many times has the next one worked? none....so why not give MM another chance and see what happens

Linehan worked out pretty well. We just didn't have a QB the first 10 games. Gus and Sage played very well the last 6 games.
 
If we hired within it wouldn't be a big deal. Jason garrett or baggett possibly. Alot of people are high on garrett so he could have a nice future calling plays. Baggett has been a coach forever and never really called plays so he just may not be comfortable doing that.
 
I don't know... This is a tough call. There are many things going on there... First MM was told he had to support the Linehan offensive planning to minimize impact to the "O". He seems to have been on the learning curve in the beginning of the season as well. If we run out the season, I think we should keep him as that will provide 2 things... an OC that learned a new system and familiarity with the team...

Our biggest problem in my opinion is that we made too many changes from last year and it takes time for a team to gel...
 
I'd rather stick with Mularkey rather than a 3rd coordinator. Let the offense settle down to one system, rather than keep changing. We might start out of the gate fast next year, if you change another slow start.
 
I think we'll go for a third OC if possible. If we have to stick with Mularkey, I hope Saban tells him to stop with the unnecessary gadget plays. Mularkey did pretty well against Chicago--a game without any trick plays.
 
clbrazee said:
I'd rather stick with Mularkey rather than a 3rd coordinator. Let the offense settle down to one system, rather than keep changing. We might start out of the gate fast next year, if you change another slow start.

I agree... Let's stick to MM and have Nick temper the play calling... The biggest thing that this would do is put a bit of flow into nextt year and I also believe that it would facilitate a quicker start to the year...
 
that is the most pointless website in the history of the internet


even back in the day with no internet if someone saw the internet for the first time and saw that he would have burned his computer and went back to the typewriter
 
Back
Top Bottom