F Matt Corral dude. Invest in building around Tua, anything else right now Is foolish. Although I do admit it would be nice to see them draft a promising developmental prospect behind him. Have a good backup to develop.Can you add Matt Corral to that poll ? Tua is getting better every week. I’m still far from sold as numbers can be very deceiving (tons of slants and passes to flats ) but he’s doing what he has to do and we are winning. There are still a few big question marks. Most of all , the kid has proven that he is a winner. To go through what we have put him through and still go out there and play well is outstanding to see.
My point was that If we stick with Tua next year we will have more cap space and draft picks available to address the Oline, WR, and Running back position. So if we stuck with Tua we would have more to invest in building a decent supporting cast around him and Tua plus a better surrounding supporting cast vs Watson with what would have to be a lesser supporting cast because of his cap space hit and the draft picks it would cost to get him would make the trade skew towards Tua if one was even halfway objective.It takes more than efficiency to win superbowl. It also take big plays in big moments with arm, with legs. And that's what we need. We need more than an efficient quarterback.
Tua, for next year is okay, but after that I am not sure. I would be okay with Watson too. My answer is either.
I do not believe Tua will take us far under rookie contract, so money is not an issue.
If a quarterback can move the ball consistently with slants and flats, what is wrong with that?Can you add Matt Corral to that poll ? Tua is getting better every week. I’m still far from sold as numbers can be very deceiving (tons of slants and passes to flats ) but he’s doing what he has to do and we are winning. There are still a few big question marks. Most of all , the kid has proven that he is a winner. To go through what we have put him through and still go out there and play well is outstanding to see.
This point is good, but I think it concedes a point that I don’t agree with: specifically, that Tua is some kind of slants and flats specialist.If a quarterback can move the ball consistently with slants and flats, what is wrong with that?
yes sir.....We agreeI’ve been against the Watson idea since it became an idea. Many reasons why.