Sparano and the Coin Toss | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Sparano and the Coin Toss

Third Eye

Scout Team
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
4,741
Reaction score
4,237
Ok folks, the Sparano bashing is at an unprecedented level and rightfully so with the ill-advised decision to throw a halfback pass on first and goal yesterday. But here is an item that has me baffled to say the least - and it has happened nearly every week he has been the coach and won the coin toss.

Sparano defers every time he wins the toss. No big deal you say? Well here is the big deal, and let me tell you why. I have two reasons why the decision to defer can cost Miami the game and basically did the Dolphins in yesterday. Reason number 1 is opinion, and reason number 2 is fact.

Reason number 1: take the ball and start a ball control, face smashing drive to set the tone. There is nothing more demoralizing than chewing up 7-8 minutes to start the game and get up 3-0 or 7-0. Why play defense first? It is a defensive mentality and shows no confidence in the offensive unit.

Reason number 2: when you defer, the choice to defend a goal is the 2nd choice. So in the first half yesterday, the Fins chose to defend a goal after the Bills took the ball. In the second half, Miami has first choice (ball or goal to defend) and they of course choose the ball. So Buffalo gets to choose a goal, and they take the goal where the wind is with them in the 4th quarter.

So in a nutshell, every time Sparano has deferred, he ends up with the poor side of the field in the 4th quarter. This has come into play at Miami home games where I always was asking why we had to kick off the infield dirt in the 4th quarter. Now we all know why. Yesterday, Lindell kicks a 56 yard FG with the wind at his back. No way in hell he even tries it in the other direction. Ok, so the wind was not overly strong yesterday, but it still was a factor. If you noticed, all kickoffs in the wind aided direction were deep in the end zone, while kickoffs the other direction never made it to the goal line. Additionally, Lindell missed a 44 yard FG in the first half when he did not have the wind direction.

The 56 yarder was basically the game winner, even though we had time to come back. But a kick like that is like a punch to the stomach of a football team.

The fact that Sparano defers directly can impact the outcome of the game, and it contributed yesterday against the Bills. If you win the toss, you basically get the ball to start the game and the wind direction in the 4th quarter. It is a no-brainer.
 
I guess he is thinking more on a getting the ball first in the second half, which we did and had a hell of a drive..
 
I like deferring the ball because then you give yourself the opportunity to have back to back possessions. In other words you could have the ball last in the 1st half score then get the ball coming out of the half and score again with out their offence getting a chance to touch the field.

If the wind was really howling I could see your point I guess.
 
I would defer everytime also. Miami stopped the Bills on that first drive and then went down the field 2 the 3 yrd line and then we saw Henning strike once again with an amazing play call. We score there we have a 7-0 lead then like we did score again and have a 14-0 lead leaving the 1st qrt and have the ball at the start of the 3rd qrt.
 
I would never defer!!!.....Football is about possessing the ball, why give it away?
 
I would never defer!!!.....Football is about possessing the ball, why give it away?

They are not giving any possessions away. It's a decision to possess the ball first in the 1st or the 2nd half.

They obviously prefer to have the ball first in the 2nd half.
 
I like the fact he defers.. Get a stop on D and we are at a huge advantage to have back to back possessions at the end of the 2nd and beginning of the 3rd. Score on both those drives and that gives you the opportunity to really put teams away.
 
Its a good feeling knowing you are getting the ball first in the 2nd half. I would do it, I even do it on Play Station:lol: even in baseball I'd rather bat last. With today's Dolphins that is one last 2nd half possession for the defense which is a good thing. I'd rather have defense play the extra possession in the first half.
 
Our defense is always lights-out in the 1st quarter. Why not kick?
 
They are not giving any possessions away. It's a decision to possess the ball first in the 1st or the 2nd half.

They obviously prefer to have the ball first in the 2nd half.

Yeah they want the ball when they can not do **** with it. I mean yeah i always like getting the ball in the 2nd half and most people do too, but the difference between miami and other teams is other teams knows the 1st is not **** if you can not finish stronger in the 2nd.
 
I'm fine with deferring. And it worked out perfectly yesterday. Stopped them 3 and out to start...and then SHOULD have punched it in for 6. Then LONG drive to grind the clock in the 3rd that actually resulted in a TD and the lead.

I'd say if you are trying to use yesterday as an example of why not to or when not to defer...it doesn't hold in this example.
 
Back
Top Bottom