If you wanna know what I think, (doubtful) I'd have to disagree with Muck a little bit. I think there was a clear ambiguity over who would be the starter opposite Chris Chambers. And there should have been even though McKnight was known as MdDrops, and he was most noted for having popped up some balls that led to interceptions, not to mention fumbling the ball. But, despite all these problems McDrops still had as many catches as 'old reliable' Oronde. To me, put together with the fact that McKnight was never really known for dropping balls in Dallas, this makes me think that of the two WRs the chances are much less that McDrops has peaked, than the chances were that Oronde had peaked.
In actuality, I believe Oronde HAD peaked in his potential, and that McKnight has not. Oronde can make some ridiculously good catches but what good is that if they are few and far between? The sentiment on this board that I've seen concerning Oronde seems always to be like one person said before, that Oronde makes catches in the clutch and as long as he's doing that we don't care if he has only 20 catches. Well I say, in Norv's offense, if a starting wide receiver has only 20 catches, no matter how clutch those catches were, either on the whole the WR is a piece of trash, or Jon Kitna was your quarterback. I've been disappointed with Oronde's production through 6 games and I don't think he's had any excuses. I mean, Jay Fiedler (especially in retrospect) might be a little better than most give him credit for. Norv Turner's offense is both awesome AND it provides for both the #1 and #2 WRs to do well (we're talking 1000+ yard seasons), as well as providing for the TE to do really well (Randy McMichael), and a 1500+ yard rusher. You want an example heck look at any of his Dallas offenses, or look at his 1999 Redskins offense. Those are offenses in which we supposedly have comparable talent on all facets of the offense...except perhaps at WR.
In that kind of setting, Oronde was on pace for like 43 catches and 600 yards, and 0 TDs. He had a QB who could make good decisions and get him the ball, he had a formidable WR on the other side drawing the #1 CB and drawing double teams, he had a talented productive Tight End occupying safeties and linebackers over the middle of the field, he had a pass catching fullback that should probably be accounted for, he's had a decent running game to draw 8 men in the box CONSISTENTLY, and he's had perhaps the best signal caller in the game calling out the plays...all that, and 43 catches for 600 yards and 0 TDs is what he was on pace for. So are there too many weapons? Too many good targets drawing from a well thats not big enough? Not if you look back to the Cowboys offenses or the Redskins offenses...
So I say Oronde's skills have always been and will be best utilized in a 3rd WR role. James McKnight should have been starting from the beginning. Thats right, I said it.