As for him being a ground-n-pound coach, you may be right. It's the bit that rankles with me about the hire (more than Fisher's career win ratio - which can be mitigated). I think coaching personnel (and to a lesser extent players) should be brought in who match and enhance the culture and identity of the team. GB, NE, Philly and SF do that very well. We were once a run-first team and enjoyed our best success being hard-nosed, but I think the Marino era is what made the Dolphins culturally. It fitted our identity better than the Csonka image and tapped into/paralleled a local psyche that's a bit more colorful than many parts of the country.
I don't think that the rungame is redundant. In fact, as Defenses recruit and train more and more to cover the pass, focus on defending the run will slip by necessity. But it's not the way the game is going and not what the Dolphins should be about.
So I dunno if Fisher will be a good NFL coach this time around. I just wonder if he's the right prototype for what the Dolphin nation wants as a coach...
Fisher was a defensive player and coach. When it comes to offense, he's not married to any one philosophy. During most of his tenure with the Titans he had solid RBs and lineplay, with mediocre receiving talent and varying QB play. After McNair blossomed, Fish had no problem opening the throttle enough for Air McNair to share in an MVP award. QB's don't win MVP awards on exclusively ground-and-pound teams. The nature and efficacy of Fish's offense will depend on the personnel more than his philosophy, or even the offensive coaching staff.
Look at it this way -- every one says that we want to be wide open like NO, or NE, or GB. What do those teams have in common? Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers. The Colts were high flying and "colorful" on offense -- that is, of course, until Peyton Manning wasn't under center. Forum favorite Brian Billick put up obscene numbers as an OC in Minnesota with Culpepper, Moss, Carter, Robert Smith etc. firing on all cylinders. Without a QB in Baltimore, he led a "ground-and-pound," run-first, defensive minded team to the Super Bowl. Had he suddenly become conservative? No. He made the most out of the personnel he had. Folks, some coaches (Mike Martz leaps to mind) insist on running their scheme regardless of their talent. When they have the right talent, great. When they don't, it's like Nero fiddling while Rome burned. Other coaches adapt to their talent (anyone here remember Don Shula, who won both with ground-and-pound in the 70's and with Marino airing it out in the 80's/90's)? I assure you that, whatever shortcomings he might have, Jeff Fisher falls in the latter camp.
Now, given our current talent, yes, Fish's offense might look very conservative because that plays to our strengths. You want to open things up? Bring in the talent. The question isn't whether Fish can be at the helm of a team with an exciting offense -- it's whether Jeff Ireland can build that team.