Statistical look at our strengths & weaknesses | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Statistical look at our strengths & weaknesses

MiamiMan147

I'm a Rocket Man
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Age
46
With the draft day approaching, there's a lot of talk about how whether we need DB help or LB help or OL help. For me personally, while I had a pretty good idea of what areas we were deficient in, they were based off my impressions from watching games. My basic feeling was: the QB play was awful, our pass blocking was decent but run blocking was sub-par, and our secondary was vulnerable. However, perception and reality often differ greatly. To get a clearer idea of where we stood, I decided to start looking at some stats to see where we ranked last year in different areas. Although most of my impressions were reinforced, I found that some of our weaknesses were even worse than I realized, while others weren't as bad. I'm going to go over a bunch of stats, and for simplicity's sake, I'll mainly focus on NFL ranking in these stats.

First lets start on offense:
Yards per game - 14th
Yards per play - 15th

So basically, our offense was very average overall last year. Now some more details:
Completion Percentage - 32nd (yep, dead last)
Yards per pass attempt - 25th
Sacks allowed - 4th
Pass attempts - 10th
Time of possession - 30th
3rd down conversion - 25th
Rush attempts - 17th
Yards per Rush - 7th

All right, so what does this tell us. For starters, the passing game is interesting. We were 4th in sacks allowed, yet 25th in yards per pass play and 32nd (dead last) in completion percentage. Part of that may have been dropped balls, but anyone who watched us last season would agree that the main culprit was the QB, who was highly ineffective despite having excellent protection. Now with the rushing stats, I was surprised to find that we were 7th in yards per rush. However, in terms of the actual number of rush attempts, we were 17th. In the passing game, we were 25th and 10th in attempts and yards per attempt, respectively. What this tells me is that we had a serious problem with the playcalling last season. Why were we passing more than running when we clearly a better running team? That coupled with our 3rd down conversion percentage, caused us to have one of the 3rd worst time of possession averages in the league.

So to recap the offense, where we were ranking 14th overall: our biggest problems were QB play, playcalling which favored our weakness over our strengths, and consequently, time of possession. Our biggest strengths were protecting that passer and the running game.

Now lets move on to defense, here's were things get more interesting and some of the things I thought were not necessarily true:

Yards per game - 18th
Passing yards per game - 20th

So from these stats, our defensive would seem to be slightly below average overall, but here's where you have to take a closer look:

Number of plays - 31st
Passing attempts - 25th
Rushing attempts - 22nd
Sacks - 2nd
Completion percentage - 15th
3rd down percentage - 25th
Yards per pass attempt - 9th
Yards per rush - 7th

Now this is where you start to see some truth emerge. The fact is that our defense was worse statistically than it really was due to the time of possession and number of plays against. Our defense was on the field for more plays than any team except San Francisco. Part of this was due to the allowed completion percentage, although here we were still slight better than average. Overall though, it seems that the biggest problem with our defense was actually our offense.

The other problem, and it wasn't a huge one, was our secondary. Overall our pass defense was pretty good - 9th in yards per pass attempt. However, you have to take into account our ferocious pass rush that ranked 2nd and only 1 sack behind the leader. If I were to guess what ranking our secondary alone would have gotten last season, I would say that it was around 16th-18th. Now consider that last season we had practice squad players at the nickel and dime positions, and those players were even starters at times. Here you see that the numbers back up the assertion that Saban is a wizard with the secondary.

So to recap the defense: our biggest problem on defense was our offense putting them back on the field constantly. Our secondary, while average as a unit, was ranked 9th overall while being helped out by an awesome pass rush. Our run defense was slightly better at 7th overall.

Ok, so lets get down to the point: what areas of the team need to improve personnel wise for us to become Superbowl contenders. The great news is that our biggest issues have been taken care of in spectacular fashion. Our big gaping hole, the QB position, has been massively upgraded, and consequently even if we keep the same pass-skewed playcalling ratio from last year, we should have a tremendously improved offense. That offense will in turn put less pressure on a defense that was better than given credit for.

After that we have no real weaknesses, as our rushing offense, rushing defense, and passing defense were all very solid (7th, 7th, and 9th on a per play basis). The next biggest weakness on the team was the secondary, which has also been improved. Even if Allen, Goodman, Cooper, and Hill don't set the world on fire, they provide excellent depth at a position were we had to make due with practice squad players for much of last year.

Now what does this mean for the draft. Well as many people have been saying, we have the luxury of taking the BPA. Contrary to popular opinion, we do not have a great need for an OLB, even if we don't sign Arrington. An OLB would help mostly with run defense and pass rush, and those were not weaknesses last year. We also have a very solid OL, which was 4th overall in sacks allowed and combined with an awesome RB core to be 7th in rushing yards. We don't have a great need for secondary help, since we've proved that even waiver wire guys can make our pass defense respectable. We don't have a need for a WR, as our QB upgrade will take care of our passing game.

Guys, what I guess I'm getting as is this: be excited. Be very excited. In 15 months Nick Saban has taken us from a 4-12 team making regular appearances in Jay Leno's nightly monologue to a team that has patched all its weaknesses by the end of March, leaving him the entire draft to make our team even better. While the Bills and Jets are in shambles and the sun is setting on the Patriot's dynasty, our star is ascending.

Damn it feels good to be a Dolphins fan.
 
The Most important stat is wins.and IMO we have improved our football team going into next year, so that 9 could easily go up a few games...

..and yes!! It does feel good to be a Dolphin!
 
That is quite possibly the most interesting post I have read this off-season. Way to gather up the stats and see between the lines... I think a few sports casters on ESPN could be replaced by you : ) nice post!!!
 
You did very good work compiling the stats, unfortunately stats still only tell a part of the story.
You asked why did we pass more than we ran, easy, we fell behind early in too many games. When you fall behind as often as we did, you have to pass to catch up.
The 3rd down stats are tells the biggest story to me. The offense was terrible at and the defense wasn't much better. Both of these contribute to the poor time of possession and number of plays run. The offense couldn't stay on the field and the defense couldn't get off it.
 
Geforce said:
You did very good work compiling the stats, unfortunately stats still only tell a part of the story.
You asked why did we pass more than we ran, easy, we fell behind early in too many games. When you fall behind as often as we did, you have to pass to catch up.
The 3rd down stats are tells the biggest story to me. The offense was terrible at and the defense wasn't much better. Both of these contribute to the poor time of possession and number of plays run. The offense couldn't stay on the field and the defense couldn't get off it.
Thats not necessarily true. I along with many other members were furious at Linehans pass happy O. In fact in a close game all day Gus threw the ball 45 times and Rick and Ronnie combined for a miserable 18 carries. That was when after the game Saban said we definantly need to improve in playcalling along with production and we started to run more and finished with a long winning streak. Great post MiamiMan147.
 
absolutely great thread. i remember when the dolphins started 0-8? ( im not poitive on that) and every talk show was making fuun of us. i recall watching PTI and them talking about what was harder to do, refering to us, 0-16 or 16-0.

But this was a great post that backs up my thoughts. When everyone was making fun of my dolphins, since i live in CA, i was always saying " wait till we get a QB!". now that we have a pro bowl caliber QB our time of posession will be better, our 3rd down conversion will be better, our overall offensive numbers will be better in every aspect, our defense will stay on the sidelines more resulting in an all around better defensive numbers.

Now what I am trying to get at is great post, and the dc trade ( like you said) will do our whole team a huge favor
 
All positions in football are interconnected. Even offense to defense as you pointed out. So often last season I blamed Gus for every thing that was happening including our opponents scoring on our defense in the 4th. This has been the case in Miami in the last 5 years as we have never had anything above average in terms of QB play.

As much as I don't like Culpepper I still know that his contribution to this team will be great. Then maybe when we are passing we are no longer doing it with a backup QB.

Nice post.

I still wouldn't mind getting Santonio Holmes with our pick at 16.
 
Nice post:D The statistics seems to prove what I've thought all along. That our defense was much better than the numbers made us believe, and that the defense's true weakness was the offense.

Our offense's time of possession was outrageous and terrible, and I don't understand why it should have been that bad with R&R in the backfield. A good running game is the key to possession and controlling the clock is a major part of the game.

Our QB problems have been addressed and our secondary is getting better. Now with a good offensive line we can build on what we had last year and get even better. We can win our division easily at this rate.
 
nice post. i didnt realize how good our o-line played. however that doesnt make me think that we dont have needs there. if anyone will stand up for McKinney as a bona fide full time starter i'll be shocked, and Jeno James, whereas a decent lineman is expensive, and we could end up saving some money by cutting him and putting someone young in there. which is why i stick to my guns saying we need interior lineman and Nick Mangold and Mak Jean-Gilles look mighty fine to me. (of course that would require us to trade down...)
 
Nick13 said:
nice post. i didnt realize how good our o-line played. however that doesnt make me think that we dont have needs there. if anyone will stand up for McKinney as a bona fide full time starter i'll be shocked, and Jeno James, whereas a decent lineman is expensive, and we could end up saving some money by cutting him and putting someone young in there. which is why i stick to my guns saying we need interior lineman and Nick Mangold and Mak Jean-Gilles look mighty fine to me. (of course that would require us to trade down...)
We got Shelton who is a road grader but not that great of a passblocker. Peele and Beasley upgraded the blocking even more and I am happy. I love Burger and think he will be good someday too. Not to mention this will be the first season Houck has them not having to learn as much and can focus on individual improvements for the returning guys that was at the top in fewest sack and solid in run blocking.
 
Nick13 said:
nice post. i didnt realize how good our o-line played. however that doesnt make me think that we dont have needs there. if anyone will stand up for McKinney as a bona fide full time starter i'll be shocked, and Jeno James, whereas a decent lineman is expensive, and we could end up saving some money by cutting him and putting someone young in there. which is why i stick to my guns saying we need interior lineman and Nick Mangold and Mak Jean-Gilles look mighty fine to me. (of course that would require us to trade down...)

U r the first person that I've heard mention interior linemen. And here I thought I was the only one that thought we needed a good guard. Everyone talks about tackles and centers around here, but what about those guards? Dont leave them out, they r getting more and more credit. Just look at that contract Steve Hutchinson got, geez.

But I agree that it would be nice to get a better guard than Jeno James. He's a great guy, but not a good enough player.
 
Back
Top Bottom