strategy changes on last two drives?

[isaacjunk]

Heck of a win...I wonder how much of our sudden success was due to strategy / playcalling? The hurry-up....also the line just seemed to hold up a bit better. Anyone have any more insights on this matter, other than simply 'Tannehill was clutch'? Also, did the rams D change at all? Very strange to put up 0 for 10 drives then suddenly score 2 TDs at the end, esp. since it's not like we wore down their run D. Perhaps their pass rush lost a step from getting after it all game

 

[spiketex]

It was significant that Gase went for the win near the finish and didn't hesitate to call aggressively when it counted. Parker probably had his best NFL game to make the catch when it was most needed and Tannehill delivered. Miami has had some terrible play calling for many years, with excessive risk avoidance, but our young coach seems to be inspiring confidence from the players and the fans.

 

[NorthernFin]

RT did have more time to throw, the line seemed to give him an extra half second or so. I literally asked myself, "Where the hell has this been all game ?!!!"

 

[Jeep]

Is it that the Offense did something different... or is it that the Rams played soft on the last two drives?

 

[DuderinoN703]

Rams went prevent didn't they? Those passes to Parker were clutch though. Tannehill put the throws only to where Parker was at.

 

[J. David Wannyheimer]

I think the rain finally letting up may have had something to do with it.

I was not at the game obviously, but some folks who were said it was pretty nasty out there.