The only thing worse than having two OC's is having not one but tow bad OC's
Surprise!!Can't be worse than Chan Gailey
You mean someone like...Fitz??I was never on the Tua bandwagon. That does not make me a pro or an anti Tua fan. I was satisfied with whomever the Team selected. I personally felt that any drafted QB is better off spending his first year on the sidelines. With Tua's last injury that affected his pelvis, this seemed to be even more important.
I feel Tua did better then could reasonably be expected and that he worked well with everyone in the QB room.
I feel a team should always have a drafted QB on the team being prepped for the replacement of the current QB. This is not the same thing as a backup QB, just a potential future replacement so that when you need one you have one.
For a backup QB I want an older vet with experience on several teams. His job is to be an immediate, but short term replacement who we can expect to help keep us competitive for a few games until the QB we have been grooming gets a lot of reps with the 1st string.
In the end we would continuously draft, train and eventually use or trade off our drafted QB's . The will be replaced with other drafted QB's.
I want to see what Tua can do this upcoming year, but if a trade pops up where we can get a lot of draft picks and a n experienced QB, then we should consider it.