Perfect72
It's Only Happened ONCE!
Perhaps the toughest question for the Miami Dolphins this offseason revolves around left tackle Branden Albert. He turns 33 next season, which isn’t too old for a good tackle. And Albert is good. He’s also a great veteran presence. He helps the younger players.
That’s what makes this such a dilemma.
Albert also hasn’t played a full season since 2010 with Kansas City. The last three seasons, he’s played nine, 14 and 12 games. Some of this is due to major injury – in 2014 he blew out his knee. This past season he missed four games due to an ankle sprain, food poisoning and a wrist injury. He played the final weeks with a cast on his wrist. Beyond that, only the Dolphins really know how much and hard he practiced and to what degree he was rested in weeks. The bottom line here is the body doesn't get healthier in football as it ages.
So here’s the dilemma for an offensive line that already has another fragile player in center Mike Pouncey: Do you accept Albert playing perhaps, what, 12 games in 2017? Or do you move second-year player Laremy Tunsil to his natural left tackle position and buy a younger, healthier guard to play beside Tunsil for the next several years?
Tough call.
Maybe there's some middle ground. Maybe Albert would accept a re-done deal. But that would probably involved taking a second year, which would had added ramifications.
If the contract remains as is, I grit my teeth, take that $7.2 million cap savings from releasing Albert and get a younger, healthier guard, as I wrote in my column about my 10 off-season steps. I wanted to expound a little on the reasons why here. Essentially, Tunsil needs to get to left tackle, if not this year then next year when Albert’s contract is done. But the key here is you can set the left side of the line up for the next several years while decreasing the odds having to juggle the line again in 2017.
More at LINK: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...ns-call-of-branden-albert-20170215-story.html
Your thoughts?
That’s what makes this such a dilemma.
Albert also hasn’t played a full season since 2010 with Kansas City. The last three seasons, he’s played nine, 14 and 12 games. Some of this is due to major injury – in 2014 he blew out his knee. This past season he missed four games due to an ankle sprain, food poisoning and a wrist injury. He played the final weeks with a cast on his wrist. Beyond that, only the Dolphins really know how much and hard he practiced and to what degree he was rested in weeks. The bottom line here is the body doesn't get healthier in football as it ages.
So here’s the dilemma for an offensive line that already has another fragile player in center Mike Pouncey: Do you accept Albert playing perhaps, what, 12 games in 2017? Or do you move second-year player Laremy Tunsil to his natural left tackle position and buy a younger, healthier guard to play beside Tunsil for the next several years?
Tough call.
Maybe there's some middle ground. Maybe Albert would accept a re-done deal. But that would probably involved taking a second year, which would had added ramifications.
If the contract remains as is, I grit my teeth, take that $7.2 million cap savings from releasing Albert and get a younger, healthier guard, as I wrote in my column about my 10 off-season steps. I wanted to expound a little on the reasons why here. Essentially, Tunsil needs to get to left tackle, if not this year then next year when Albert’s contract is done. But the key here is you can set the left side of the line up for the next several years while decreasing the odds having to juggle the line again in 2017.
More at LINK: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...ns-call-of-branden-albert-20170215-story.html
Your thoughts?