Tamehill = NiICE. Next Step? = DOUBLE DOWN on QB

[TrinidadDolfan]

Yes. Predicting we will "double down" by taking another QB with the 2nd 3rd rd pick or 4th.
Wecome to the "double dip"

P.s I am all for it.

 

[TrinidadDolfan]

An inside and outside chane at the same time. BINGO.

 

[Mabdul Doobakus]

I don't know. I think you'd want to focus on developing ONE and only ONE project at QB.

 

[ROADRUNNER]

I can see us use one of our 3rd picks on another QB...............

 

[Nublar7]

Sure, we could definitely do that. Moore and Garrard are free agents after this season and only Tannehill and Devlin(who probably doesn't have much of a future on the roster) under contract. I could see one of those veterans being re-signed, but it could be nice to draft Tannehill's future backup

 

[H4wt Pocket]

No thanks...

 

[matt11390]

No way. We will double dip but it will be at WR

 

[state06]

IMO you dont take a QB in the top ten expected to be your franchise QB only to draft another relatively early. You get help for whoever our QB will be next. Whether it is WR or OL unless someone falls.

 

[LikeUntoGod]

Brock Osweiler

 

[Mage_Phin]

Yeah wasting a pick on a position we just addressed is a great idea.

 

[TrinidadDolfan]

Nah. Not when we have been starving for a QB for the last decade.

 

[SabanHater]

too many other needs.

 

[Rev Kev]

No way. We will double dip but it will be at WR

we may double up on WRs - we aren't going QB you are right - how stupid would that be? Create pressure on your #8oa

 

[zach attach]

We need too many other players. Why draft a 3rd rd. qb and he ends up better than our no. 8 pick? The embarrassment would be too great to Ross and crew.

 

[TrinidadDolfan]

Nah. Not when we have been starving for a QB for the last decade.