Tannehill Had A Very Rough Time | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill Had A Very Rough Time

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216
RT was 16 of 29 for 196, a TD and a pick. He was sacked 3 times, hit 4, I counted 3 batted passes, and there were a number of hurries.

From what I saw, a lot of his damage was done when the game was pretty much in hand, with the Jag's D demoralized, as was the much of the running yards. I'll take any win, even one as ugly as this. However. this kind of play is not gonna get it done in the next four games. The OL and team is going to have to step it up a bunch.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The OL was terrible for much of the game. You cannot run an offense without at least decent OL play. I keep wondering why they don't move the pocket more and why they are not running the hurry up at times to shake things up.
 
He played well enough. The pick was a bad play call on first and goal. The batted balls a function of our o-line getting pushed. He missed Landry for a TD on their last score on third down. Hartline and Clay are invisible. Actually Hartline is visible making almost no plays.
 
Typical shaky start, do this against a good team and most likely a loss. Let's hope we start strong the next few weeks.
 
Just the 4th game of out 7 where our offense was vacant in the first half, now let me look for that rug we can sweep this under so we can blind ourselves to it since we won.
 
This next stretch of games is going to be incredibly tough. Chargers are a very good team. The Lions and the Bills both have an incredibly good Defensive Line. Here's to hoping for good team play all around.
 
I'll take it. A road win is a road win.

Not RT's best outing, but was good enough to get us a win.
 
He played well enough. The pick was a bad play call on first and goal. The batted balls a function of our o-line getting pushed. He missed Landry for a TD on their last score on third down. Hartline and Clay are invisible. Actually Hartline is visible making almost no plays.

Hartline is visible for all the wrong reasons
 
The OL was terrible for much of the game. You cannot run an offense without at least decent OL play. I keep wondering why they don't move the pocket more and why they are not running the hurry up at times to shake things up.

From what I saw, there was nowhere to roll or move the pocket to. We got beat up by Jag's DL.
 
He picked up his game when the oline gave him time. I don't forsee this being an issue. What you should talk about is that gorgeous deep pass to Wallace. Great DEEP pass
 
Jags D wasn't demoralized (I guess you think that cause the announcers said it) until Tannehill completed the 50 yard pass to Wallace.

Couple of key 3rd down drops from Hartline that would have been first downs in the first half also didn't help but Tannehill definitely has issues when 4-man fronts get to him early and get sacks and pressures. I think that's true of a lot of QBs...seems to work very well against Tom Brady but for Tannehill it really does knock him off his rhythm.

What I don't understand, given the pass rush and the struggles passing the ball, why we didn't run more. At one point it was 20 called pass plays (3 of them sacks) and only 6 running plays. Lazor needs to be smarter about this...it's not the first time we've had struggles in pass protection and we keep calling pass plays.
 
Tannehill, OL and Hartline play like that is a loss against SD and Buffalo.

I would add in Detroit and Denver. The OL has to be better. I'm wondering if Hickey may do something before the trade deadline. There are no replacement options in house.
 
how many drops did the most expensive WR's Corp in the NFL have today?
 
Back
Top Bottom