Tannehill or Bortles? | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill or Bortles?

The comparisons are long past the point of tiresome irrelevance. Score points and win games. That's the comparison Tannehill needs to win, in relation to his prior seasons. It's ridiculous to pretend there aren't valid concerns. At Texas A&M he directed a team with a huge power rating yet finished 7-6 with many blown leads.

Bortles has been able to finish off those games. Likewise with Kaepernick so often. He rallied Nevada from a huge halftime deficit to upset a terrific Boise State team that had legit designs on the national championship game. Heck, as a freshman Kaepernick nearly upset Boise State on the road as a 35 point underdog, losing 69-67 in a game then went into overtime tied at 44-44. I remember it well because I had Boise State -17 in the first half and never had a chance. Who is this gangly kid scoring all those points against me?

You can see how absurd it's become when a thread shows up regarding Foles' level of play this preseason. That has no relevance to anything but via the desperation to adjust we want to believe Lazor was solely responsible to Foles' terrific 2013 and now will do the same for Tannehill.

When I was watching Russell Wilson the other night against the Bears I had to belly laugh at all the claims that he's not really much of a player, strictly the product of a system and boosted by supreme teammates. Minus the pathetic notion that we have to compare and apologize, those posts wouldn't exist. Wilson would be accepted for what he has been on every level, an excellent quarterback who overcomes his stature.

As a kid I distinctly remember not caring how good the rest of the league was. We were better. It would show up on the field. As I posted in the "scared" thread, those early '70s teams didn't need to tell the rest of the league why they should be worried about us. It's only when we're stuck in this pathetic range of slightly varying mediocrity for so many years that we resort to never ending worthless comparisons combined with whining that our team and players don't get enough respect.

Get in the end zone and earn it. At that point you won't care what Johnny Manziel and Blake Bortles are doing. Right now it's guaranteed that if either one of those guys -- among others -- gets into a game and stinks it up, there will be gloating threads. Meanwhile, do you really think Seahawk fans care about Ryan Tannehill's level?
 
I reject your notion of either or. Nice try.

I have been and will continue to believe, you build your team from the inside out. So if the online is not getting it done, a lot of blame goes there. I guess my posts through last year, and my bitching of the line fell on deaf ears around here.

Tannehill, good or bad, gets the majority of blame because he's the qb. Just like others in the league. Matt Ryan going 4-12, with a terrible defense and crappy online....gets the blame. Tannehill needs to step up his game. This is yr 3 and you water boys need to understand that patience only gets you so far in the NFL, when starting qb talent is bypassed yr after yr. He needs to work on his accuracy and avoid the shell shock look displayed late last year.

Critiques of the golden child, is not a either or proposition.

I reject your notion that there is something magical about year 3. As long as he keeps improving, he isn't going anywhere. I don't see very many people blaming Matt Ryan. Cam Newton got a total pass for year one and year two.

Tannehill has played solid football under piss poor circumstances. The shell shock comment is total crap. He stood in all year and kept slinging it despite getting hammered again and again. The Tannehaters sound like a bunch of whiney babies.
 
Do you blame Marino for no SB rings from 1983 - 1999?

Go back and read my thoughts on the Shula thread. I put a lot of blame on Shula and his inability to draft and build a team to help Marino.
 
I reject your notion that there is something magical about year 3. As long as he keeps improving, he isn't going anywhere. I don't see very many people blaming Matt Ryan. Cam Newton got a total pass for year one and year two.

Tannehill has played solid football under piss poor circumstances. The shell shock comment is total crap. He stood in all year and kept slinging it despite getting hammered again and again. The Tannehaters sound like a bunch of whiney babies.

The Jets made the mistake of holding on to long. Year 3 does matter.

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------

Do you blame Marino for no SB rings from 1983 - 1999?

Are you wanting to compare Tannehill to Marino?
There was absolutely NO question Marino was a high caliber QB, from the moment he took the reigns and started slinging the pigskin.
 
The Jets made the mistake of holding on to long. Year 3 does matter.

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------



Are you wanting to compare Tannehill to Marino?
There was absolutely NO question Marino was a high caliber QB, from the moment he took the reigns and started slinging the pigskin.

Why so wishy washy? Either the QB gets the bulk of the blame or not.
 
When I was watching Russell Wilson the other night against the Bears I had to belly laugh at all the claims that he's not really much of a player, strictly the product of a system and boosted by supreme teammates. Minus the pathetic notion that we have to compare and apologize, those posts wouldn't exist. Wilson would be accepted for what he has been on every level, an excellent quarterback who overcomes his stature.

It makes me laugh, the length some will go to in order to try to marginalize the impact of a player like Wilson.
 
this is stupid. the real debate is Lauren Tannehill vs. Lindsey Duke

LT:

LT2-1.jpg

LaurenTannehill-1.jpg

LaurenUferTannehillPage173com21-1.jpg



LD:

duke1-1.jpg

LindseyDukePaddle-1.jpg

lindseydukebikini-1.jpg


LT is prettier but LD has the body. I'll take both.

Is Duke the broad on the right in that photo with the 2 chicks?
 
Back
Top Bottom