Tannehill's Grades- Game by Game | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill's Grades- Game by Game

So Be

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216

Ratings
WeekGamePosSSnapsOverallPassRushPass BlockScreen BlockRun BlockPenalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB Hu
1,03516.415.2-0.40.00.00.01.62-0310
1MIA @ CLVQBS70 / 700.40.5-0.30.00.00.00.20-0
2MIA @ INDQBS66 / 662.03.7-1.90.00.00.00.20-01
3ATL @ MIAQBS56 / 563.12.60.40.00.00.00.10-0
4MIA @ NOQBS60 / 60-1.9-0.9-1.10.00.00.00.10-0
5BLT @ MIAQBS59 / 594.74.40.20.00.00.00.10-0
7BUF @ MIAQBS67 / 67-1.5-1.3-0.40.00.00.00.20-0
8MIA @ NEQBS80 / 800.40.30.40.00.00.0-0.31-0 1
9CIN @ MIAQBS63 / 632.72.10.40.00.00.00.20-0
10MIA @ TBQBS59 / 593.53.5-0.10.00.00.00.10-0
11SD @ MIAQBS66 / 66-1.3-1.4-0.10.00.00.00.20-01
12CAR @ MIAQBS67 / 670.90.8-0.10.00.00.00.20-0
13MIA @ NYJQBS82 / 822.31.40.70.00.00.00.20-01
14MIA @ PITQBS62 / 620.0-1.71.60.00.00.00.10-0
15NE @ MIAQBS64 / 643.83.60.00.00.00.00.20-0
16MIA @ BUFQBS49 / 56-1.9-1.50.00.00.00.0-0.41-0
17NYJ @ MIAQBS65 / 65-0.8-0.9-0.10.00.00.00.20-0
clear.gif


This is a breakdown of what PFF thought of RT game by game. IMO it's easier to dispute than for the entire year, as most forget how players played over all for the 16 games.
 
They have his best games as Balt, Pats #2, and TB, and his worst as Buff #2, NO, and Buff #1. Agree or disagree?
 
Well, I know the Baltimore game wasn't a good result for the team, but when I watched the mashup of all the pass plays on a second and third viewing, he actually played really damn well in that game.

So I agree with that one.
 
J. David Wannyheimer said:
Well, I know the Baltimore game wasn't a good result for the team, but when I watched the mashup of all the pass plays on a second and third viewing, he actually played really damn well in that game.

So I agree with that one.
Click to expand...

I thought the same but, thought he would have had a lower grade vs the Jets #2 I also agreed on the Pats game.
 
J. David Wannyheimer said:
Well, I know the Baltimore game wasn't a good result for the team, but when I watched the mashup of all the pass plays on a second and third viewing, he actually played really damn well in that game.

So I agree with that one.
Click to expand...

You've been saying that all season. Maybe people will listen now. Probably not though.
 
i would like more info on what the numbers mean ie what is average etc...
 
Well his pass, screen and run blocking are better than most of our lineman.
 
These are nice, but I'm more interested in the trends and development. Last year he hoped great promise but wasn't good enough in 3rd down efficiency and red zone efficiency. This year he made major strides in those areas. That is more meaningful to me. I watched the games and there is no question the kid has a ton of talent. Now it is putting it all together.

The OL wasbad. They were not only the main reason for sacks but also the main reason for our lack of running game. But, I think the go - go go thing might have been worse for Tannehill. Teams that knew that tell really teed off on him and he fared very poorly comparatively.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
I have no idea what any of these numbers mean aside from highest being best and lowest being worst, but what are these measured against? These numbers really mean absolutely nothing without knowing what the benchmarks are.
 
J. David Wannyheimer said:
Well, I know the Baltimore game wasn't a good result for the team, but when I watched the mashup of all the pass plays on a second and third viewing, he actually played really damn well in that game.

So I agree with that one.
Click to expand...

but it was a defensive TD that tied the game late then w/ a chance to tie it the best he could do was set up a near 60 yd FG. he didn't get the job done that day. Nice yardage #s, no TOs but D tied game then got a stop, he had the ball tied at 23 and went 3 and out. Bal kicks FG, he has 1:42 on the clock from Mia 20- an eternity to get into decent FG range even w/ no TOs left. sets up 57 yard FG. That was not a good game for him.
 
yeah the last 2 drives wanny where the pockets collapsed from the outside in...qbs got to do better than that...:rolleyes2:

never mind the complete jail break pressure on 4th and an eternity where he rolled out and hit gibson on a 46 yarder to move the chains...

seriously shut the **** up
 
nyjunc said:
but it was a defensive TD that tied the game late then w/ a chance to tie it the best he could do was set up a near 60 yd FG. he didn't get the job done that day. Nice yardage #s, no TOs but D tied game then got a stop, he had the ball tied at 23 and went 3 and out. Bal kicks FG, he has 1:42 on the clock from Mia 20- an eternity to get into decent FG range even w/ no TOs left. sets up 57 yard FG. That was not a good game for him.
Click to expand...

Way to leave out the sack that moved the ball back and the dropped pass by Clay that would have moved the ball closer. Nice try though.
 
hooshoops said:
yeah the last 2 drives wanny where the pockets collapsed from the outside in...qbs got to do better than that...:rolleyes2:

never mind the complete jail break pressure on 4th and an eternity where he rolled out and hit gibson on a 46 yarder to move the chains...

seriously shut the **** up
Click to expand...

all those excuses mean nothing, he didn't find a way to get that game tied and the only reason he had a chance was b/c his D scored a TD for him. Great throw on that 4th down play, what was the end result?

---------- Post added at 09:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:54 AM ----------
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Way to leave out the sack that moved the ball back and the dropped pass by Clay that would have moved the ball closer. Nice try though.
Click to expand...

he gets no blame for the sack? let me guess? it was all the OL's fault like every negative play, right?
 
hooshoops said:
yeah the last 2 drives wanny where the pockets collapsed from the outside in...qbs got to do better than that...:rolleyes2:

never mind the complete jail break pressure on 4th and an eternity where he rolled out and hit gibson on a 46 yarder to move the chains...

seriously shut the **** up
Click to expand...

Sanchez would have ran into his own lineman.....

---------- Post added at 09:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 AM ----------
nyjunc said:
all those excuses mean nothing, he didn't find a way to get that game tied and the only reason he had a chance was b/c his D scored a TD for him. Great throw on that 4th down play, what was the end result?

---------- Post added at 09:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:54 AM ----------



he gets no blame for the sack? let me guess? it was all the OL's fault like every negative play, right?
Click to expand...

Perhaps if you watched the games, you'd have a clue...... Never mind, that won't help.
 
$anchez would have had you playing in postseason.

I watched more than enough, some good games(vs. NE- great actually), some bad, mostly mediocre.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom