Tannehill's ratio

[BlueFin]

I expect about 2-1 in favor of touchdowns.

He should move past Fiedler into 3rd all-time in touchdowns and yardage....he won't come near reaching Fiedler's career interception total though.

 

[Mudder1310]

I would say 32-18.

 

[Fintastic2124]

5 to 11

You'd love that, wouldn't ya?

 

[tay0365]

I would say 32 TDs to 14 INTs

 

[Buddy]

33 TD and13 INT where I am sure that the referees blatantly missed the pass interference.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

 

[CalDolFan10x14]

35 to 14

 

[mnphinfan]

33-12, Lazor is already showing he will move his wr's to take advantage of mismatches and one of Tannehill's biggest strengths is his pre-snap defensive recognition. I also think Wallace is going to have a big year as well.

 

[FinsGonnaRock06]

30-10, Tannehill makes a believer out of all the naysayers, woot woot, Tanne Like a Boss!!!

 

[NY8123]

Since we have Tom Brady 2.0 now safely on the roster in Brock Jensen and Tannehill is clearly Drew Bledsoe 2.0, Jensen will unseat Tannehill in camp and lead to the firing of Matt Moore sending Tannehill to the bench as the backup. So 0-0 with Jensen setting records for Passing yardage, Attempts, TD, Passer rating and completion percentage.

Just kidding Tannehill will be fine, I'd like to see him somewhere around 30-12. 2.5:1 is the ratio you need to stay above.

 

[Dthrill_08]

28-13

 

[EdwardAndrsn]

48-16. I am basing this off todays practice.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

 

[fishfanmiami]

I'm looking for a more efficient Tannehill but I think Lazor is going to run the ball more than we did last year so i'd guess 26 and 12.

 

[Phinsfan93]

4,200 yards
28 TD's
13 INT's

10 wins :)

 

[LDaniel7]

Tannehill's numbers being good re: TDs is going to depend on Wallace being healthy and playing the Desean Jackson role. He's the only WR on the roster that can do this.

Every other WR is a glorified possession WR. Landry a good pick but he's as slow as Hartline in pads -- quicker, yes. More sure handed, greater catch radius and more physical -- but not a number 1 WR.

I see the same essential problem at WR as we had last year. And I gotta think that Lazor sees it too, which is why so many WRs were added to the roster in the off-season. Problem is, they all look limited skillwise. Exception of Landry, possibly.

LD

 

[Dsteve]

can you really take a troll seriously with statements like this? "Fiedler did not have the arm strength of Tannehill, but overall he was a much better QB."