Tannehill's Stat's against RB's with 3 or more Children
- Thread starter mahmacoat
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,290
- Reaction score
- 16,056
:sidelol:
phazer
Active Roster
- Joined
- May 9, 2010
- Messages
- 538
- Reaction score
- 107
You just tripped the fu+k out..Lmao
KTOWNFINFAN
Seasoned Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Messages
- 7,426
- Reaction score
- 2,439
Does it matter how many mothers those 3 children came from?
NJPHINFAN79
Active Roster
I laughed so loud when I read the title, I woke my dog up...
Speaking of, how's tanny vs four legged animals :hump:
Speaking of, how's tanny vs four legged animals :hump:
[video=youtube;1litfDdWlsU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1litfDdWlsU[/video]
You're welcome.
Oh damn that is some funny ****. Real funny ****.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2005
- Messages
- 15,549
- Reaction score
- 2,652
Still waiting for the numbers.
WE NEED THE NUMBERS.
WE NEED THE NUMBERS.
You're going to be waiting about seven days.
mialuv13
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,053
- Reaction score
- 9
Posted this in the other thread you decided to derail. Though you would find it funny:
Ah, the wonderful use of ad hominem to obfuscate the point of the thread. The point of the thread being that Tannehill has performed adequately against the good opposing QB's TEAM, not the good opposing QB directly. And since there is a correlation between being a top tier QB and being on a top tier team, it is quite simply deduced that Tannehill has outperformed his average play against better teams.
Further, nowhere in OP's post was he answering or trying to understand an effect or phenomenon created by the circumstances of adequate play in games against good QB's, or that adequate QB play from Tannehill is caused by playing a team with a top tier QB. OP was merely stating what his stats are against teams that have better QB's. Thus, "causality" is misused, as this thread was focused on a dry stats when facing a top tier QB's teams. Any correlation from causality is simply in your own mind.
It was fun having you while it lasted, though. Fun to reply to posts when people miss the point on threads and keep digging holes. In your defense, there certainly are a lot of stat correlations going on recently, but that's the fun in having a team who is decent mid-way through the season.
Ah, the wonderful use of ad hominem to obfuscate the point of the thread. The point of the thread being that Tannehill has performed adequately against the good opposing QB's TEAM, not the good opposing QB directly. And since there is a correlation between being a top tier QB and being on a top tier team, it is quite simply deduced that Tannehill has outperformed his average play against better teams.
Further, nowhere in OP's post was he answering or trying to understand an effect or phenomenon created by the circumstances of adequate play in games against good QB's, or that adequate QB play from Tannehill is caused by playing a team with a top tier QB. OP was merely stating what his stats are against teams that have better QB's. Thus, "causality" is misused, as this thread was focused on a dry stats when facing a top tier QB's teams. Any correlation from causality is simply in your own mind.
It was fun having you while it lasted, though. Fun to reply to posts when people miss the point on threads and keep digging holes. In your defense, there certainly are a lot of stat correlations going on recently, but that's the fun in having a team who is decent mid-way through the season.