i would much rather have Chambers that #56 is one player not a team
He said he wants a team not just one Player but Chambers was One player and the #56 pick is going to be one PlayerAre you somehow suggesting that Chris Chambers is plural?
chris chambers is a proven top 5 reciever in the nfl
Actually, it won't be #56. If the Giants lose to the Packers, the pick will be #58. If the Giants beat the Packers, it will be pick #57. Either way though, we got more trade value for Chambers then we did for Welker.When will people learn that it's not about one player. It's about the team.
Pick #56 versus Chris Chambers cap charge?
I'll take pick number 56........
True Zod, if a bit cheeky, right now we would be working the phones trying to get something for Chambers, we would be fortunate to recieve a 4th rd pick for him in the offseason, now we have #56 on a rebuilding team that is no small thing.
It may even allow us to trade out of #32....
chris chambers is a proven top 5 reciever in the nfl and we gave it up for a 56 pick for someone that has a 1-20 chance of being close to chambers talent
chris chambers is a proven top 5 reciever in the nfl and we gave it up for a 56 pick for someone that has a 1-20 chance of being close to chambers talent
chris chambers is a proven top 5 reciever in the nfl and we gave it up for a 56 pick for someone that has a 1-20 chance of being close to chambers talent