The 2-Point Play - I Say Uncage These Guys | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The 2-Point Play - I Say Uncage These Guys

JoeFin

Scout Team
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
379
Reaction score
359
So I was listening to the radio this evening after the game and the guys were saying how stupid the 2-point "trickeration" play was. Their line of reasoning was (almost a direct quote, I believe): "You have to go to your bread and butter play. You have to run something that's guaranteed."

The problem is, this year, there IS NO "bread and butter" play. There IS NOTHING that's "guaranteed."

The play didn't work, but I still like the call. I think with this team, there needs be a lot more "trickeration." People say that Ronnie needs to be running more, and maybe that's true, but up to this point he hasn't really shown much overall. Giving him more carries might just get us a lot more "not much."

Especially at this point, I would say just cut it all loose. There's talent on this team, and it isn't gelling together, so why not just uncage it? Maybe these particular guys on this particular team just need a new attitude- i.e. a "who gives a &@!$" attitude. Just let them play.
 
that call was absolutely horrible........

Why? You prefer our "bread and butter" play? ... BTW, what would that be?
 
Calling for your stud RUNNING BACK to PASS isnt "letting your stars loose".. It was a wretched, pathetic call..
 
JoeFin said:
Why? You prefer our "bread and butter" play? ... BTW, what would that be?

Ummm, lets see.. How about a play that actually features our players' BEST ATTRIBUTES? You know, like not having Ronnie Brown, a running back, trying to win the game for us by PASSING!?
 
JoeFin said:
Why? You prefer our "bread and butter" play? ... BTW, what would that be?

When you have a guy that has 'ups' like Chambers you toss it to him in the corner of the end-zone....
 
Calling for your stud RUNNING BACK to PASS isnt "letting your stars loose"..

"Stud" compared to whom? ... That's my point.
 
The Call was a Classical !


Like I said in another thread
If it work it still would have been a stupid Call:confused:
 
JoeFin said:
"Stud" compared to whom? ... That's my point.

Your point is .irrevalant. So I take it you think Ronnie cant run for 2 yards.. Yet you think he can PASS for 2 yards with a crowded endzone?
 
mia4ever said:
The Call was a Classical !


Like I said in another thread
If it work it still would have been a stupid Call:confused:

The answer is "yes".. Just "lucky" stupid instead of just "plain" stupid.
 
Sorry, you guys are right. ... Doing things "by the book" has been working great so far. Why fix what ain't broke?
 
the play was stupid, i would rather have daunte try to find a seam to get it, or run with ronnie
 
Back
Top Bottom