The Beck Ryan Polarization- A Reality Perspective | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The Beck Ryan Polarization- A Reality Perspective

Vaark

They call me Speedo but my real name is Mr Earl
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
38,725
Reaction score
61,992
Location
Beam Me Up Outa Here!
I don’t think there’s much argument that there’s a continuing polarization of the pro-Beck and draft-Ryan camps here on Finheaven. I’ll readily admit I’m in the former and although I don’t dislike Ryan, I think, juxtaposing him with the last 3 draft classes, he’d be at best the 5th and possibly the 9th QB selected. While I can’t see anointing him a “Franchise QB†on the basis of his BC performance, especially since he was barely on the radar in 06 and could well be a 1 year wonder, I think he’s demonstrated sufficient upside to justify a mid teens – mid 20s draft pick, and of course a pick like that has indeed served the Fins well back in the 80’s, right?

As a Beck supporter, I have strong sentiments about risking a #1 pick on a QB whose college career was no more impressive than the QB we already have. In fact, while Beck’s stats went up each year, Ryan’s went down! Yes, Ryan won 2 bowl games whereas Beck’s merely 1-1, however in his senior year, he led BYU over Oregon in the most lopsided bowl win in the school’s illustrious football history. Speaking of that, well sorta, the argument has been made that Beck’s BYU spread offense lends itself to more accuracy than BC’s pro-style offense – and that may well be the case. I think a counterpoint though is to consider how many BYU QBs won the Superbowl, vs. those from BC.

As to Ryan supporters clamoring for a “competent†QB on the basis of Beck’s poor performance last year with the prior year’s 3 best receivers now catching passes in NE, St Louis and SD, their best RB on the shelf and a coach who had him running the scout team up until the week before he was given the starting position, I believe a fair question is just how much better, if at all, Ryan would have performed under the center. I know that last year’s “Can’t Miss†QB, the inflatable $60Million LaMarcus Russell, with a better team, one of the 6 best running attacks in 07, actually underperformed Beck in most meaningful stats excepting fumbles (and there the difference between “small-handed†Beck and ham hocked Russell was 2 fumbles.. yes, only 2 fumbles.

Excuse the long-winded buildup (it’s my natural default, LOL), but HERE’S THE QUESTION: if Ryan is drafted and over his first 4 or 5 appearances (note the distinction between “appearances†and “startsâ€)he performs as poorly as Beck, or even worse, like Russell, how many of those Ryan advocates would be calling for his head? How many would be calling him a “bum,†“loser†etc.?? How many would criticize the present “Ryan’s okay but too flawed for a top 5†camp if we were making the same criticisms of him that they make of Beck? You can argue that we risked over $60MM, or over $35MM guaranteed on Ryan so we have to stick with him, while we only spent maybe 15% of that on Beck and only a 2nd round pick, eh? Sure both Mannings were off to slow starts their first years, etc… and look how long it took for Brees to get going, so it’s not really indicative of their upside, right?? But couldn’t you say the same thing about Harrington, Couch, Carr, Leaf, either “A†Smith to name a few??? And look how much better off their teams would have been if instead of sticking with them, they went back into the draft the following year to snare a “better†QB.

So if the shoe was on the other foot with Ryan and either he rides the pine for a year (a luxury not afforded Beck) or comes in over the first several games to perform as poorly as Russell (worse than Beck)

,………. How the heck could any of Ryan’s supporters NOT be a hypocrite telling his draft critics that we’re being unfair, premature or unrealistic… especially with the next one-year franchise QB just around the bend in either the 08 or 09 draft??? Just Sayin.

5x64cj-1.gif
 
our FO doesn't believe he is worth the #1, so why are we still talking about this?

turn the page
 
I don’t think there’s much argument that there’s a continuing polarization of the pro-Beck and draft-Ryan camps here on Finheaven. I’ll readily admit I’m in the former and although I don’t dislike Ryan, I think, juxtaposing him with the last 3 draft classes, he’d be at best the 5th and possibly the 9th QB selected. While I can’t see anointing him a “Franchise QB†on the basis of his BC performance, especially since he was barely on the radar in 06 and could well be a 1 year wonder, I think he’s demonstrated sufficient upside to justify a mid teens – mid 20s draft pick, and of course a pick like that has indeed served the Fins well back in the 80’s, right?

As a Beck supporter, I have strong sentiments about risking a #1 pick on a QB whose college career was no more impressive than the QB we already have. In fact, while Beck’s stats went up each year, Ryan’s went down! Yes, Ryan won 2 bowl games whereas Beck’s merely 1-1, however in his senior year, he led BYU over Oregon in the most lopsided bowl win in the school’s illustrious football history. Speaking of that, well sorta, the argument has been made that Beck’s BYU spread offense lends itself to more accuracy than BC’s pro-style offense – and that may well be the case. I think a counterpoint though is to consider how many BYU QBs won the Superbowl, vs. those from BC.

As to Ryan supporters clamoring for a “competent†QB on the basis of Beck’s poor performance last year with the prior year’s 3 best receivers now catching passes in NE, St Louis and SD, their best RB on the shelf and a coach who had him running the scout team up until the week before he was given the starting position, I believe a fair question is just how much better, if at all, Ryan would have performed under the center. I know that last year’s “Can’t Miss†QB, the inflatable $60Million LaMarcus Russell, with a better team, one of the 6 best running attacks in 07, actually underperformed Beck in most meaningful stats excepting fumbles (and there the difference between “small-handed†Beck and ham hocked Russell was 2 fumbles.. yes, only 2 fumbles.

Excuse the long-winded buildup (it’s my natural default, LOL), but HERE’S THE QUESTION: if Ryan is drafted and over his first 4 or 5 appearances (note the distinction between “appearances†and “startsâ€)he performs as poorly as Beck, or even worse, like Russell, how many of those Ryan advocates would be calling for his head? How many would be calling him a “bum,†“loser†etc.?? How many would criticize the present “Ryan’s okay but too flawed for a top 5†camp if we were making the same criticisms of him that they make of Beck? You can argue that we risked over $60MM, or over $35MM guaranteed on Ryan so we have to stick with him, while we only spent maybe 15% of that on Beck and only a 2nd round pick, eh? Sure both Mannings were off to slow starts their first years, etc… and look how long it took for Brees to get going, so it’s not really indicative of their upside, right?? But couldn’t you say the same thing about Harrington, Couch, Carr, Leaf, either “A†Smith to name a few??? And look how much better off their teams would have been if instead of sticking with them, they went back into the draft the following year to snare a “better†QB.

So if the shoe was on the other foot with Ryan and either he rides the pine for a year (a luxury not afforded Beck) or comes in over the first several games to perform as poorly as Russell (worse than Beck)

,………. How the heck could any of Ryan’s supporters NOT be a hypocrite telling his draft critics that we’re being unfair, premature or unrealistic… especially with the next one-year franchise QB just around the bend in either the 08 or 09 draft??? Just Sayin.

5x64cj-1.gif


You make some valid points but they have all been discussed a million times. Time will only tell whether Beck or Ryan pan out as good QB's. Its time to start supporting the QB's we already have and leave all the draft Ryan talk in the past.
 
You make some valid points but they have all been discussed a million times. Time will only tell whether Beck or Ryan pan out as good QB's. Its time to start supporting the QB's we already have and leave all the draft Ryan talk in the past.

Amen!
 
You make some valid points but they have all been discussed a million times. Time will only tell whether Beck or Ryan pan out as good QB's. Its time to start supporting the QB's we already have and leave all the draft Ryan talk in the past.
Nonsense. The time for that is after the draft. We still have a good two weeks of get a franchise QB talk :beer1:
 
I am pro-dolphin

I am not anti-Beck

I am now on the Henne bandwagon

because I am pro-Dolphin I feel that we should not put all our eggs in a Beck basket
 
I am pro-dolphin

I am not anti-Beck

I am now on the Henne bandwagon

because I am pro-Dolphin I feel that we should not put all our eggs in a Beck basket

I think you need to stick all your eggs in the Beck/McCown basket as they are the only two with a chance at starting. Henne wouldnt even compete for the job if they draft him, so its not worth discussing. Dont expect a QB in the 2nd round. They need to find starters and not another QB project.
 
we're not drafting Ryan and Beck will start and I'm happy about that.

Ozzy rules!!
 
I think you need to stick all your eggs in the Beck/McCown basket as they are the only two with a chance at starting. Henne wouldnt even compete for the job if they draft him, so its not worth discussing. Dont expect a QB in the 2nd round. They need to find starters and not another QB project.

are you Dave Wandstedt?

only a moron would subscribe to a 1 year rebuilding plan

should we build a team first and draft a franchise QB in '10? or should we pursue the franchise QB with all haste while building the team over the next 3 years?

I think the latter is the smart choice.

if you were planning a project would you start the shortest tasks first and put off the longest tasks? I wouldn't
 
We don't live in the fairly tale world of Dan Marino, Joe Montana or John Elway. One must keep in mind that for a QB to be succesful then he is going to need an abover average supporting cast and not a mediocre one.

Between 2000 and to this day, we have only had a couple of offensive line players that made an impact in all of their seasons.

1. Vernon Carey
2. Samson Satale
3. Jeno James

These gentlemen are probably the only players who were above average out of big group of players and that speaks louder than a crying Matt Ryan chant.

It has been a while that we have had a solid group of offensive linemen and this is how it will look.

LT Carey
Guard(insert)
C Satele
RG Smiley
RT Jake Long

Or would you rather march into the season like this.

LT carey
LG (a nobody)
C Satele
RG Smiley
RT A nobody

Is that the group that will open holes for Ronnie and Protect our qb?
 
Very articulate, well thought out post. Unfortunately, if the intent was to sway any of us one way or the other, it probably won't work. Most of us (myself excluded) don't have a long enough of an attention span to read the post in it's entirety. But very good points and counterpoints nonetheless.
 
We don't live in the fairly tale world of Dan Marino, Joe Montana or John Elway. One must keep in mind that for a QB to be succesful then he is going to need an abover average supporting cast and not a mediocre one.

Between 2000 and to this day, we have only had a couple of offensive line players that made an impact in all of their seasons.

1. Vernon Carey
2. Samson Satale
3. Jeno James

These gentlemen are probably the only players who were above average out of big group of players and that speaks louder than a crying Matt Ryan chant.

It has been a while that we have had a solid group of offensive linemen and this is how it will look.

LT Carey
Guard(insert)
C Satele
RG Smiley
RT Jake Long

Or would you rather march into the season like this.

LT carey
LG (a nobody)
C Satele
RG Smiley
RT A nobody

Is that the group that will open holes for Ronnie and Protect our qb?

So in other words there is some hidden rule in the NFL that says any team that drafts a QB is further prevented from drafting a OT or OG later in that draft. And I will also assume that we will be oprevented from picking up a guard or tackle after the June 1st cuts and the August cuts. In other words the only way we get a Tackle is if we draft Jake Long. If we pass on him we are prevented from addresssing this position until 2009
 
So in other words there is some hidden rule in the NFL that says any team that drafts a QB is further prevented from drafting a OT or OG later in that draft. And I will also assume that we will be oprevented from picking up a guard or tackle after the June 1st cuts and the August cuts. In other words the only way we get a Tackle is if we draft Jake Long. If we pass on him we are prevented from addresssing this position until 2009

Not entirely my fellow miami fan aprez. A quality player is not the same as a good player. A great player is not the same as an excellent player. A dominant player shadows those below them and that is where I stand.
 
First of All...

You make some valid points but they have all been discussed a million times. Time will only tell whether Beck or Ryan pan out as good QB's. Its time to start supporting the QB's we already have and leave all the draft Ryan talk in the past.

First of all, let's give him credit for a BEAUTIFULLY EXCUTED post!

BRAVO!

You express your points PERFECTLY and in a very persuasive manner! Yes, some of the same things have been said before but rarely as well and concisely.

As to the point of WHY are we talking about QB's?

Ummm.. if you THINK you KNOW what PARCELLS is going to do with the #1 pick then you're just LYING to yourself.

Let's do the math.... The media says that the WORD is that Miami doesn't want the bet QB or RB available, that they're happy with RONNIE BROWN/RICKY WILLIAMS/JOHN BECK and what they REALLY want is to either trade down or get a TRENCH guy in one of the LONGS available.

So, we KNOW Parcells likes to MISLEAD so that he can act on draft day in complete secrecy and we have the MEDIA TELLING us that the top QB and top RB are NOT in the Dolphin's plans. We negotiate with GHOLSTON and JAKE LONG but so far, not with anyone else.

So..... Why are talking about MATT RYAN?

Because no one, ESPECIALLY the MEDIA, knows who our first pick will be. Even when we have a deal that's been agreed upon with a potential draft pick, there's no GUARANTEE that we'll GET that guy and not another.

So I say FREE SPEECH is a right and a priviledge! If the fans can't discuss RYAN 2 weeks BEFORE the draft, when can they do it? HAHAHA!!

Cuz I don;t wanna hear about him AFTER the draft unless he's a PHIN. Just like BRADY QUINN, I don't care about him at all. He's not a PHIN so you know.. Whatever. He could break both legs or cure the common cold for all I care, I still don't wanna hear anything about him at all.

So GREAT post on the BECK/RYAN debate!

Lastly, MY opinion is that RYAN is the best of a SORRY group of QB's so we should pass. ALEX SMITH for the 49ers was MUCH MORE highly touted and look what he's done as a starter over there...

QB is a bit of a mystery postion, especially in the first round. Give me one of the LONGS and I'm fine.

GO PHINS!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom