The Pats and the leprechaun up their wazoo

[TB12]

Having Manning ahead of Brady is an absoute joke. That scrub is 9-10 in the playoffs, pads stats in regular season and chokes in the playoffs.

Marino was not a winner, another joke to put him near Brady

Graham? LOL!!!!!!!

 

[nyjunc]

Top 3? LMAO! Nope.

I can name 5 QB's waaaaaaaay better than Brady in 2 seconds...Montana, Marino, Unitas, Manning, and Graham.

Brady is in the Bradshaw, Aikman set of HoF QB's.


Super Bowls don't come into the equation when discussing individual greatness. Only the pandering media and retards use them in this fashion.

switch Manning and Brady and that is a perfect top 5 all time(not in that order though)


You do realize what a sinking ship NE was when Brady took over, right? They were getting worse every year, there were already whispers about BBs job, they were 5-11 in 2000 and started 0-2 in 2001(which included an opening game lose to a bad Bengal team) then magically they start winning as soon as Brady steps o the field.

 

[nyjunc]

Having Manning ahead of Brady is an absoute joke. That scrub is 9-10 in the playoffs, pads stats in regular season and chokes in the playoffs.

Marino was not a winner, another joke to put him near Brady

Graham? LOL!!!!!!!

You can't say on one hand that marino can't be there b/c he didn't win then laugh at Graham as no QB has won more than Graham.

 

[ChrisHanson]

Having Manning ahead of Brady is an absoute joke. That scrub is 9-10 in the playoffs, pads stats in regular season and chokes in the playoffs.

Marino was not a winner, another joke to put him near Brady

Graham? LOL!!!!!!!

Manning has played better in his playoff career than Brady has in his. Manning, in the regular season, has played better than Brady has there too.

The COLTS are 9-10 in the playoffs, dolt.

Marino wasn't a winner? Let me guess...you're around 16-25 years old, right? Meaning your were just getting your pubes when the Pats won their 1st Super Bowl and never really watched Marino, right?

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 PM ----------

switch Manning and Brady and that is a perfect top 5 all time(not in that order though)


You do realize what a sinking ship NE was when Brady took over, right? They were getting worse every year, there were already whispers about BBs job, they were 5-11 in 2000 and started 0-2 in 2001(which included an opening game lose to a bad Bengal team) then magically they start winning as soon as Brady steps o the field.

Yeah..and the Colts were great when Mannning took them over. haha

Patriots without Brady = 11-5

Colts without Manning = 3-13

 

[nyjunc]

Manning has played better in his playoff career than Brady has in his. Manning, in the regular season, has played better than Brady has there too.

The COLTS are 9-10 in the playoffs, dolt.

Marino wasn't a winner? Let me guess...you're around 16-25 years old, right? Meaning your were just getting your pubes when the Pats won their 1st Super Bowl and never really watched Marino, right?

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 PM ----------



Yeah..and the Colts were great when Mannning took them over. haha

Patriots without Brady = 11-5

Colts without Manning = 3-13

NE was 5-11 the year before Brady and he started '01 at 0-2, where is this 11-5 coming from?
Indy was 2 years removed from being in the AFC Title game when Peyton took over.


Manning a better postseason QB than Brady?:lol2::lol2: