I believe the issue is that Devante Parker looks as though he is going to play up to a true #1 receiver and one if the better ones at that. Is love to be wrong here so please let me know if I am. I believe the issue is this...Say we give Landry the extension before this season starts. Then Devante breaks out in a big way and turns into something along the lines of Julio Jones, or something close to it. Then next off-season its Devantes turn to get paid or walk...I don't think we even have the option to pay him if we are already paying Landry AND Stills big money. We will be forced to let Parker walk. I hate to say it but I think we have to see just how well he plays this year before we give Landry big money that way we can determine who of the two makes more sense to keep. If Devante blows up and becomes the Big, true #1 that is so hard to find then I think we'd be better off keeping him as it'd be easier to find a player in the mold of Landry. But if Devante is just so-so then we can keep Jarvis and possibly sign Devante too, but to a smaller contract BC his play would dictate smaller money. But if we lose out on the opportunity to sign Devante simply BC we gave Jarvis the extension early, well that would be a killer...I don't know but it makes sense to me. I think that's what's going on...tell me if im crazy